|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
I love this idea.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
|
I love this idea.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23901
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
I'd like to suggest that it's done the other way around, with Beta as the more open freer group where "proposals" can be discussed. Then if Mark endorses them he create a post in a subgroup for
|
I'd like to suggest that it's done the other way around, with Beta as the more open freer group where "proposals" can be discussed. Then if Mark endorses them he create a post in a subgroup for
|
By
Simon Hedges
·
#23900
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Coordinate banning w removal
#suggestion
In addition, sometimes a banned member is described as "banned" in the Past Members list but does not even appear in the Banned list. And on top of that, the date field in the Banned list now shows
|
In addition, sometimes a banned member is described as "banned" in the Past Members list but does not even appear in the Banned list. And on top of that, the date field in the Banned list now shows
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23899
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
The proposal process seems too complicated to me. If I want to make a simple suggestion like, "I think the background color should change to orange on Halloween," I don't want to have to go through a
|
The proposal process seems too complicated to me. If I want to make a simple suggestion like, "I think the background color should change to orange on Halloween," I don't want to have to go through a
|
By
JohnF
·
#23898
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Subgroup staging state and scheduled start date/time
#suggestion
"something like "this group will start functioning februari 30th, 18.45 UTC"
Nice idea, but why limit it to SUBgroups?
groetjes, Ronaldo
|
"something like "this group will start functioning februari 30th, 18.45 UTC"
Nice idea, but why limit it to SUBgroups?
groetjes, Ronaldo
|
By
ro-esp
·
#23897
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Italian reply to message by email uses preface RES, not "Re," creating new topic
#bug
Oops, looks like it's Portuguese, not Italian.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
|
Oops, looks like it's Portuguese, not Italian.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23896
·
|
|
moderated
Italian reply to message by email uses preface RES, not "Re," creating new topic
#bug
I'm not sure what kind of bug this is, but it seems that at least in the one case attached here, a reply via email by someone in Italy attached the preface "RES", instead of "Re:," which caused lack
|
I'm not sure what kind of bug this is, but it seems that at least in the one case attached here, a reply via email by someone in Italy attached the preface "RES", instead of "Re:," which caused lack
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23895
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Online reply remembers original, not adjusted subject text if a hashtag was removed
#bug
Yes and there's some similar funkiness with merging and splitting. The titles are not kept in synch. Noticed this a long time ago, but since I no longer merge or split, including rarely changing a
|
Yes and there's some similar funkiness with merging and splitting. The titles are not kept in synch. Noticed this a long time ago, but since I no longer merge or split, including rarely changing a
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23894
·
|
|
moderated
Re: New Group Charter
#admin
Hi Mark,
I noticed that two of the new topics (69961750, 69961762) you copy-created over from Canny have duplicate threads already existing in beta. (I know because I'm the perpetrator of both the
|
Hi Mark,
I noticed that two of the new topics (69961750, 69961762) you copy-created over from Canny have duplicate threads already existing in beta. (I know because I'm the perpetrator of both the
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#23893
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
It's not a terrible idea, but I don't think Mark would necessarily get the best product from that. The features he's thinking about at any given time are unlikely the ones where people have a great
|
It's not a terrible idea, but I don't think Mark would necessarily get the best product from that. The features he's thinking about at any given time are unlikely the ones where people have a great
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23892
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
Mo,
I think this is a good suggestion.
Perhaps one way to solicit suggestions for a specific features would be for Mark to create a message asking for input on that subject, example:
"Looking for
|
Mo,
I think this is a good suggestion.
Perhaps one way to solicit suggestions for a specific features would be for Mark to create a message asking for input on that subject, example:
"Looking for
|
By
Bill Hazel
·
#23891
·
|
|
moderated
Online reply remembers original, not adjusted subject text if a hashtag was removed
#bug
Greetings,
Short version:
Here's a glitch, in short, at least in beta, when one replies through the online interface to an existing message which had its original subject altered by removing a
|
Greetings,
Short version:
Here's a glitch, in short, at least in beta, when one replies through the online interface to an existing message which had its original subject altered by removing a
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#23890
·
|
|
moderated
Re: hashtag "done" for suggestions, analogous to "fixed" for bugs
#meta
#done
Sorry, my bad. They are still there. I missed the "More" feature.
--
Gerald
|
Sorry, my bad. They are still there. I missed the "More" feature.
--
Gerald
|
By
Gerald Boutin <groupsio@...>
·
#23889
·
|
|
moderated
Re: hashtag "done" for suggestions, analogous to "fixed" for bugs
#meta
#done
Mark,
The list of hashtags seems to be smaller than it was previously. Were #misc and #fixed and perhaps others deleted intentionally?
#misc I am OK with losing as it is the same as no hashtag.
--
|
Mark,
The list of hashtags seems to be smaller than it was previously. Were #misc and #fixed and perhaps others deleted intentionally?
#misc I am OK with losing as it is the same as no hashtag.
--
|
By
Gerald Boutin <groupsio@...>
·
#23888
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
I have a different idea.
Mark what is your vision for groups.io or are you at the stage of needing input for new tech?
Maybe instead of a free for all we concentrate on one area of the system at a
|
I have a different idea.
Mark what is your vision for groups.io or are you at the stage of needing input for new tech?
Maybe instead of a free for all we concentrate on one area of the system at a
|
By
Mo
·
#23887
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Following a new topic sends out catch-up emails with missing group [Subject Tag]
#bug
UPDATE:
I followed a new beta topic today (https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/new_group_charter/69937945) and the auto-generated catch-up emails came in mixed, some did have the [beta] tag, others
|
UPDATE:
I followed a new beta topic today (https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/new_group_charter/69937945) and the auto-generated catch-up emails came in mixed, some did have the [beta] tag, others
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#23886
·
|
|
moderated
Expanding expanded message view upon mouse hover
#suggestion
Hello
Currently, if you want to read messages via the web site, you can either use non-expanded view (which shows only a very short preview of each message, without line breaks) or expanded view,
|
Hello
Currently, if you want to read messages via the web site, you can either use non-expanded view (which shows only a very short preview of each message, without line breaks) or expanded view,
|
By
Samuel Murrayy
·
#23885
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
Well, if you could implement a search feature in GIO that allows users to limit their search to (a) the subject line and (b) the first message in a topic, you can reduce much of the reposting of
|
Well, if you could implement a search feature in GIO that allows users to limit their search to (a) the subject line and (b) the first message in a topic, you can reduce much of the reposting of
|
By
Samuel Murrayy
·
#23884
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
But isn't that more analogous to beta itself?
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
|
But isn't that more analogous to beta itself?
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23883
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Process to propose new features
#meta
I think this effectively just kicks the can down the road. You, Mark, are the ultimate decider on whether a suggestion gets submitted. You have the power right now, since new topics are moderated,
|
I think this effectively just kicks the can down the road. You, Mark, are the ultimate decider on whether a suggestion gets submitted. You have the power right now, since new topics are moderated,
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23882
·
|
