I agree that a member search function is needed. As far as the opt in/opt out debate, I would think that would be a group's decision. The way I would handle it is to make the Owner/Administrator

>>>On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:17 PM, J_Catlady wrote: As I've lamented before - left coast reasoning. LOL. G explicitly stated (and I believe that J and C are missing that point) -- NOT add a tag

Of course not, which is the point I've been trying to make from square one. You are adding special symbols to imitate or effectively create a tag. I'm giving you kudos for the creativity. Don't put it

>>>On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:57 AM, J_Catlady wrote: PS - no one cannot currently add a tag to a msg body. One can add or edit some text into it that could later be searched on, but that is not

If effectively does this by creating a new thread out of the single message, as I explicitly said. Your method of inserting special symbols into an individual message may be useful but I think falls

>>>On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:19 AM, J_Catlady wrote: NO, C's method does not create a tag on the individual message. And the 1st line above doesn't make logical sense anyway. One cannot tag an

That's already there. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Perhaps there should also be two other pieces of info: 1. Timeout: Specify how long before this expires 2. Not you: What to do if you didn't want this (eg - ignore) -- Gerald

Aah, yes. So... ------------------------------------------------------ Thank you for your interest in Groups.io and the group "WHATEVER". Please reply to this e-mail to confirm your e-mail

I have mentioned here a couple of times that I think another aspect of the confirmation request wording is misleading. namely, the word "complete." The email directs the person to reply in order to

FWIW, the thread in question is: https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/topic/69689947 == My suggestion is to change this: ------------------------------------------------------ Thank you for your

I'm talking about joining over email. In GMF someone complained that people don't hit reply but send a message to GROUPNAME@groups.io My suggestion is to replace the "please reply to this email"

Hello I like the fact that I can see how many pending actions there are in my groups, as a number next to "Your Groups", because seeing this number prompts me to take action. Unfortunately, if I

Obviously I cannot speak for Mark but an earlier post from him suggested the use of hashtags by him to show progress / status, and why I hinted at #SorryButNo and #Done!. Chris

Whatever method is used, I think a concise list of changes that in line to be implemented would be extremely helpful. We all ask for changes, but then we have no idea if the suggestion disappears

Mark; I have / there is an issue with the column widths in the Member List, with insufficient space available for the email information. By way of example I have just received a reply to a Pending

Some here have said that this would be confusing because it would mean that hashtags would then be used in two different ways, but I don't think it would necessarily be confusing. If I understand

But Christos's suggestion actually created a hashtag on the individual message by creating a single-message new thread. Since your reply was a response to his and mentioned a "better" way, the

Of course you can add tags to message bodies. I, too, suggested simply using the search function as a workaround. I don't think that's the gist of the original request. -- J Messages are the sole

Christos, I replied to your reply, with an alternate (and IMO better) way to tag a message. One simple step instead of forwarding emails and 6 or steps or whatever it was. Follow the same