Lotta cat lovers in this group! Glad it’s appreciated. Seriously, the toy is unbelievable. Happy New Year to everyone, too! 😊🐱 -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially

That's so funny ... the last thing I expected on this list was to learn about a great toy my cat would probably love (looks fantastic!) Thanks for the accidental post & Happy

Never mind. Got cats too. Happy new year to you and your cat. Victoria Von: main@beta.groups.io [mailto:main@beta.groups.io] Im Auftrag von J_Catlady Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Dezember 2019

You can do this for yourself: In Admin > Settings > Message Policies > Hashtag Permissions; set this to Messages from Subscribers can only be tagged with existing hashtags, new hashtags will be

I like to run my group as close as possible to a traditional mailing list. please create an option to disable/ hide the hashtag feature.

This suggestion is for an option to Auto Follow Likes, similar to Auto Follow Replies. (Not sure whether to post on canny any more, so am posting here.) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

Canny is a nice interface, but, for me, it makes keeping up with groups.io more difficult because it is yet another thing to monitor. Using hashtags in beta to separate new feature requests, bugs,

SORRY! Posted to wrong group. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

My cats' feather wand toys were wearing out so I looked for a couple of new ones. Among the ones I ordered was this

I just had to delete an inappropriate topic from a group I moderate and accidental used the pull down menu from the previous topic. While there is a confirmation dialog it does not contain any

>>> ... But if we click on view/reply online, there should not be a reply box automatically opened. We can do that for ourselves once online by clicking the reply button.

Hi. I am a lurker here, never post. Always interesting to me to see the discussions. On the group I moderate, this subject of rules comes up often. Almost always brought up by someone who is

Mark, I had to look it up to see why it would be a problem. Personally, I don't see it as a problem. Anyone who doesn't want to be here is welcome to leave. You and I don't really agree politically,

I agree with both of the above. I often want to view online just to see the whole thread together, even though I have no wish to reply. But if we click on view/reply online, there should not be a

And I actually was one of the first to advocate for that at the time. The fact that Mark needs - and highly deserves - to make a living, and a good one, does not really bear on this except possibly as

Experienced users may know to email Support for bugs but the concept of emailing Support, in general, is a recognized way to ask for help and not specifically for reporting bugs. As a newbie, I found

I get the digest and click the "view/reply online" in order to read the topic online. I have to routinely clear multiple blank drafts that have been unknowingly created. While I occasionally "like" a

Why yes it is his prerogative! And he almost immediately closed the thread! 😃 so fortunately there is no need for you to continue to bring up your points! Susan B

Sure, that's HIS prerogative as owner/moderator, and people can contact the mods OFFLIST about such things. My point is that nobody is interested in discussions about whether to have a discussion.

It's not necessarily downloaded with the message. I have Thunderbird set to leave an attachment on the server until I specifically open it. So for me, it takes longer to open an attachment than it