Actually, the Subject Tag can be anything you want. A lot of groups use the group name or email address, but others don't. The GroupManagersForum uses [GMF] for the Subject Tag. Duane

All five groups use the same Subject Tag? the Subject Tag for this group is: [beta] I don't think this is possible as the Subject Tag is determined by the Group Email Address the Group Email

Wouldn't this exponentially increase the group's usage depending on the size of the group's cover photo? It would seem to me that this would mandate a large increase in server needs and associated

I would suggest you set up mailboxes/folders for each group and message filters to sort your incoming emails.  Easy to do Bruce Wilson Barrie, Ontario, Canada Life Member NMRA Member Scale 7

Are they? IME it only takes a brief glance at the "From" address or Subject Line to determine the group from which any given message has come. Chris

As a new owner, I suddenly find myself receiving messages from five groups, which are visually indistinct. I've set some to Daily Summary, which should help. But it would be aesthetically pleasing

Not true. The "Send Message" function can be used on pending members. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only

There is already the 'Pending Subscription' notice facility mentioned upthread, for asking standard question(s) of applicants. If responded to 'correctly' that will be adequate in most cases - but

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 06:08 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote: As a rough estimate, I think it was around 3300 groups. Which means accepting 3300 invites and solving around 3300 captchas. I was very fortunate

I would therefore like to request three rounds of questioning for pending members. Just because someone doesn't like them doesn't mean some groups might want them. After all, it would be optional per

Chris: "Has it? It might be my memory failing but I have no recollection of this cropping up on GMF, at least not "recently" (undefined) and certainly not in the form in which you have expressed it

Has it? It might be my memory failing but I have no recollection of this cropping up on GMF, at least not "recently" (undefined) and certainly not in the form in which you have expressed it above. Why

I don't think that would ever happen anyway. It's fraught and complicated enough already with the one round. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My

Victoria, is this as well as the questionnaire you can have sent out automatically for restricted groups before the person joins? See

Regarding Victoria's request #1: I'd much prefer not to have two rounds of requests for information. I use the auto-reply to ask for all the information I need. This has been working spectacularly

Hi, so I dare to request two features, now that the big transfer wave is ebbing away: 1. Inspite of the option to send out a member notice for more information about an applicant before approving

I didn’t know about the notification. That’s a nice feature. But while we’re on the subject of my comment, which said that the feature you requested already exists, I think it would be a good

Yes, always best to start simple. You've changed my mind as well. Also saw your reply in the site, thank you. I like how I had a notification when I opened the page to let me know you commented.

I agree now that the title length limit is good. But disagree with adding categories. As you say, simplicity is great. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My

Worked perfectly for me! I like it. I like the simplicity. One click with no login prompt. Other feedback systems appear overly complicated. Limiting title length is good, forces users to come up