I checked your account and you have no transfer requests set up. If you see an issue, please forward the details directly to me and I'll investigate. Thanks, Mark

How can you tell which groups.io group is recognized as having the transfer request. I just created a transfer request for a 'shadow' group after creating a request for the original group... seems

It will be charged after your month that you already paid for has elapsed (so Nov 27th it looks like for your group). Once you switch to annual, you can go ahead with the transfer process even if your

Hi All, The optimization I added yesterday did the trick. Search indexing is caught up and is keeping up with group imports. Thanks, Mark

Mark, I hope you can help. I'm in a similar sutuation. I started with $20 premium monthly and saw the charge on my CC. When I realized I needed a Premium Yearly, I upgraded the account. Settings *

All fixed. Moving along ok

I suppose it boils down to if you are the kind of person who likes to browse the shelves in a library rather than just ask for a specific book. I've been doing that since I was ten years old so I do

Ronaldo, I'm not ignoring you. I answered you in lots of little replies. I didn't realise that's bad form here so they got deleted. I'm still working out the small differences in function here but I

I don't think it would change anything, other than creating additional lines. As each message is imported, a certain amount of processing has to be done. Whether it's from a small group or a large

The experts in the forums advise against moving members separately and my active members are against that idea as I am because we want members to maintain their ownership of their data that is

My group is moving forward in the queue not back so apparently there are not a lot of expedited vroups lately. The monster groups are the problem.

The suggestion was NOT to jump ahead of members who expedite. You misread and misunderstood! And it is not driving anyone crazy to wait. It is unfair to have to wait for monster groups. Monster groups

Expedited groups go to the head of the line! I watched out group go from 8 to 9 to 8 to 7 to 8 to 9 to 8.... you get the picture. We are finally imported and everything is in place and working

I´ve formatted the article and saved it as a word document. Is it o.k. to upload it in the files? Victoria

Then a BUG REPORT it shall be-- seems the sorting problem reported after this could be a corresponding related issue. I saw that behaviour and just had a WTF moment. But yes it was there when I typed

While I'm sure everyone is anxious to get their group transferred, I think Mark has found the most equitable procedure - first in, first out. As I understand it, only a limited number of processes

Thank you Judy. Turns out it is a problem so I'll guide the owner to fix it.

If groups used them consistently, didn't abuse them and I could use Boolean operators then maybe. As Ronaldo pointed out tag and keyword abuse is an old game. Harder to moderate than a choose a single

Yes, I understand how a multi keyword search works. It's a standard function of all search engines. Trust me, you may not but, I do need a way to exclude terms and that's Boolean operators. They were

Well the system I propose does. With our intelligence not AI. It's just a matter of being able to sort the list better so you have smaller chunks to wade through. That's the entire point of the