Trying to get an integration going from one of the YAHOO groups just for the email list aspect. I dded the integration email addres to the group member list, so the emails coming in to the groups.io

Now that I think about this, I realize that one might need options for receiving notifications as well as for initiating them. -- Gerald

Yes, and it also filled up almost 10 pages of notification messages online. Bad enough having to delete them from email accounts and online I would have to delete them one by one. -- Gerald

I believe they should exist (for all items) if turning them off isn't going to be a group setting, with a default of off. I'd also like to see it set so that someone can't send multiple notifications

I think that you should have the check boxes. Have a blessed day! Steph

Mark, I think they absolutely have to be optional for moderators. Whether they're optional for non-mods could possibly be a group setting. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

Hi All, As I continue to work through notifications, questions arise. Right now, some existing notifications are optional. When adding a file, for example, you have a checkbox to notify the group.

You can manage the wiki on GitHub as a normal git repo, and it would be interesting to have for the files section managed through git as well. This would open all sort of very easy and interesting

Changes to the site this week (resend with proper formatting): NEW: Upload Folder button in the Files area to upload a directory of files. API: Added /newmembernotice, /updatemembernotice,

Bruce, My initial concept was "no", matching Bryce's use case. On the other hand I generally support the notion that a member should have the right to remove their own material. I'm willing to

I accept all of the suggestions. In retrospect, I feel it could be a single message, or ultimately the entire topic. In my situation, most of the messages within the topic would need to go on lockdown

Bruce, In my concept they remain visible to mods and owners. Like a locked or moderated topic, I proposed an eye-slash icon (badge) to the left of the subject

That was brain fart on my part...Shal already suggested the eyeball-slash character as a label. I still like the idea, but I guess I'm confusing myself with the use cases. This proposal is being

Okay, upon further reflection I can go along with that. Question: How does one find a hidden topic (or message) in order to unhide it later? How are they flagged so those with the proper privileges to

Excellent! Thanks Mark. Jim Fisher -- http://jimellame.tumblr.com - My thoughts on freedom (needs updating) http://jimella.wordpress.com - political snippets, especially economic

Peter, Both cases are received by the same user account at gmail, whether an alias was predefined or not. The alias case simply allows the user to filter incoming messages based on the

Shal: Understood now. So if no aliases are defined and I send an email to <myname+sometext@...>, it will simply strip and discard "+sometext" (which is what I have seen), whereas if I define

Bruce, Yes, I believe that was the intent, similar to Locking or Moderating a topic. True, but the use case I see for hiding just a single message would be in an otherwise valuable and/or important

Peter, That's exactly what Gmail means by an alias: username+foo is an alias for username. But it isn't stripped - the +foo part shows in the received message and is available for use in filter

I like the idea, if restricted to Topics, and given only to Owners and Moderators with the "edit archives" permission. The ability to hide individual messages can create confusion when the remaining