Duane, I folks are violating RFC2821 then they are not treating them the same. However, I think only “.” is safe.. Dave

If that's true, then it's not "safe" to use any punctuation in the local part. Per RFC 2821, they should all be treated the same. Duane

Lena: Its true that we have only found one mailserver with this bug so far, but the type of mailserver with this bug could appear in other locations and I don't think it is safe to continue using a +

Lena: This practice (of stripping the localpart after a +) may not be just happening at the single mailserver that we have found (synchronoss.net). .It may be a single TYPE of mailserver equipment

Not some hosts (plural), but single broken mailserver used by a part of BT users.

Scott, I would like the users of my group to be able to pay Groups.io directly. I don't want to accept donations because I suspect the donations would greatly surpass the premium cost for a year. If

As Gerald mentioned, this is available, but groups.io (understandably) charges a small fee to cover their credit card processing cost (and you have to have a stripe account). When I recently moved a

Hi Gerald, that doesn't work the same way. With the current Donation feature I would have to have an account and manage money. I don't want to manage money, I want Groups.io to get all the money!

Over on the Group Manager's Forum, it was suggested that I raise this problem here. Please read through the topic with the same name as this one on that group to see the full story, but in essence

Eric, I think that feature may already exist. Take a look at this topic to see if it meets your needs: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/21108 -- Gerald

In my group, a lot of users are willing to pay for the Premium upgrade. So far, I paid for the year, several others have offered to participate but I don't want to start collecting money from people

Highly recommend open sourcing. The company I worked for open-sourced several products that I worked on. We saw no dips in revenue and it made the products more salable. These were enterprise service

Replying to my own email... I could see at some point re-implementing the web interface on top of the public API. Once that's done, that'd be an easy thing to open source. Also, depending on what

Funny you should mention photos. I just added all the photos api endpoints. You can now modify photos and albums. Please post on the API group if you have any questions or issues using those

A lot of the API is read only. If it was OSS I could submit a PR with a proposal. for example, my group users are asking about managed tagging for photos. I looked at the API thinking I might be able

Mark, My recommendation: Pemalinks (like message numbers). Assigned when the page is created, and never reused. https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/28775194 Or that, but I'd separate them at page

It matters if you change the name When it makes the two things not the same. To the first URL If you say "fare thee well," Then that is the end of the game. (Best I could do on short notice!:)--

The way things are now is that the Title is used to generate the URL. How would you propose to change it? Separating the title and URL when editing a page? That might be a bit confusing. Thanks, Mark

Ok, I can send you at least one example (from this morning) and will look for others. But I still don't understand the problem in general. Isn't the auto-sig treated as a separate entity within

Please send me some examples. My guess is this is due to a change I had to make because in some cases, we were showing signatures that did not belong to the person, because we are unable to determine