i make this request not only because of my ill-fated limerick this morning, which I copy/pasted from a Word doc, and which appeared here with extra line spaces, but because the problem occurs

Bruce, I would say "yes", with the possibility of leaving the link behind on the Upgrade/Billing page, updated to point to this new folder. Shal

darn formatting came out all wrong! :-( -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond

According to Marv, let’s use “post” And make the word “message” a ghost. When shooting the breeze, Don’t “message me” please Or screen real estate will be toast. -- J Messages are

Memory, storage, processor cycles, and bandwidth are all cheaper than dirt compared to the last century. But screen real estate in these days of pocket computers, is still precious. "Post" is shorter

It would be handy to have a system-created "Emailed Files" folder from which non-image message attachments can be more readily examined. I envision the controls to be similar to what's available in

Technotronic Dimensions, Recall that this test is only applied to messages posted by email that lack the customary "In-Reply-To:" or "References:" header field. That should be a minority case in

Thanks for your hard work Chris in your evaluation and testing, I dont see anything being left out and you built on my original findings quite more than my efforts, which was my intent that someone

Chris, Two principles of operation might help. 1) Replies don't edit the topic's Subject in the web UI. Only the Edit Topic function does that. 2) When Groups.io processes a message posted by email

The original query (which I have to say I did not find entirely clear in its description of the problem) appears to have conflated two completely separate “phenomena” in the way Groups.io behaves.

Ken, This is the context I think applies - the user is a visitor at a web site. What appears on the page is the site talking back to you. I fully agree with this point of view, please don't take my

The investigations have been done (all bar one which will have to wait for >30 days) and I am now writing the report; it should be finished later today / this evening UK time. Whether it provides

Ken, I suggested the change in venue to stay in keeping with this group's mission, n.b. the beta group's home page description. Once the facts of "what is" are established it would make sense to

Ken, You perceived rightly, thank you. While groups.io seems simple when you are conditioning a group to your needs, it is actually extremely complex. And more often than not, what I want to do can be

I'm curious, Mark. Does the API have many programmatic clients outside of the groups.io infrastructure itself? Best, Glenn -- We must work to make the Democratic

From my point of view this thread has generated more heat than light. I have started a series of tests on Shal's test group and have found one "anomaly" (the quotation marks are important here) but

Ken, What I've seen in Groups.io (I mean the interface, not user content) is that /message/ is the noun, and /post/ is the action. A message has four key components: To, From, Subject, and body. In

shal I haven’t a clue about updating the page, or it’s incorrect at all. You referred me to that page in reply to my question why two subject lines, identical, would end up in different threads.

Changes to the site this week: CHANGE: The email bounce returned when sending a message to a group you're not subscribed to had a link to the /join page, which if you are logged in, would bounce you

Funny about the food menu analogy. The best pizza place where I live (Berkeley) serves one kind of pizza each day and that’s it. The only choice you have to make is how many slices you want. (Also,