Yeah but we’re just a bunch of users expressing our preferences, ranging from most naive to most sophisticated points of view (I don’t lump myself in with either of those). All kinds of features

Perhaps I am misreading this, but are you seriously suggesting that groups.io can't be improved? I agree that it is the best system out there, but anything can be made better, even the best

If that's true, then the preference system is not designed correctly. The whole point is that the product is a variable superset of user preferences, that setting a preference one way for one

Ditto what "J" Catlady said but add lots more years and experiences. Sit back for another year or so, enjoy the ride and you will see groups.io has no peer -- Bob Bellizzi

But a decision still needs to be made about whether mods can choose, on their own, to receive (and/or send) owner messages. I was just pointing out a minor inconsistency with the way things work right

You can call it a bug or an inconsistency. 😀 -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

I thought we decided a while back that this was a bug, not an inconsistency. eg) It should be working this way (but it isn't): eg) Owner sets the permisison (P) and the Moderator is given the option

That’s great and I would generally agree. A lot of us here, like you, and including me, are (or were at some point) senior se’s and I’m sure you understand that it’s not always just

So, I've avoided a number of discussions here and on GMF because they seem to boil down to folks arguing about personal preferences of one sort or another. I work as senior software

Ok, but that doesn't explain why orig subj orig subj ended up in different threads/subjects/topics (take your pick <wink> ) They are identical. Might the algorithm be updated to also ignore other

[avoding over quoting] Shal, I get your point that's a matter of style, so there's no "rule" as you try to point to. It's a matter of "direction." Talking to the screen, the settings are "my"

No, it is an inconsistency. If something is a permission, I can't give it to myself. It must be given to me by someone higher up. You would not call a variable that can be set by either the member or

Confusing it can be - no arguments there. However, the way I look at it, there are two different bits of data that determine how the feature works. One: the Permission - That allows the moderator

Yes, unfortunately this makes hashtags a lot less useful than they otherwise would be. For example, there is no point for a moderator to edit a message topic by adding a hashtag to a previously

To add to the inconsistency and/or confusion: Last night I changed two moderators' subscription options (or email delivery options, whatever you choose to call them) so that they will receive all

Confused! Are we saying that adding a #HT in effect editing the topic (- or is that the “thread”? or the “subject”? or the “topic”? — I guess it doesn’t matter if consistently being

Could Video embedding be enabled in MCE? https://www.tiny.cloud/docs/plugins/media/ That way users can post videos and see them directly embedded in posts on the site.

Nope thats basicly what happened. I thought the rest of the messages would get the tag if the 1st message was later assigned a tag. The replies , as well as the 1st post were all done via

Technotronic, Ok, I think I figured out what's going on. Here's what the Topics and the Threading Algorithm, on the Group Managersr Forum Wiki reads:

You added the hashtag to a message post in the archive. If someone replied to that message in the archive the reply would have been hashtagged also; but I think if they replied to the original