Yes, unfortunately this makes hashtags a lot less useful than they otherwise would be. For example, there is no point for a moderator to edit a message topic by adding a hashtag to a previously

To add to the inconsistency and/or confusion: Last night I changed two moderators' subscription options (or email delivery options, whatever you choose to call them) so that they will receive all

Confused! Are we saying that adding a #HT in effect editing the topic (- or is that the “thread”? or the “subject”? or the “topic”? — I guess it doesn’t matter if consistently being

Could Video embedding be enabled in MCE? https://www.tiny.cloud/docs/plugins/media/ That way users can post videos and see them directly embedded in posts on the site.

Nope thats basicly what happened. I thought the rest of the messages would get the tag if the 1st message was later assigned a tag. The replies , as well as the 1st post were all done via

Technotronic, Ok, I think I figured out what's going on. Here's what the Topics and the Threading Algorithm, on the Group Managersr Forum Wiki reads:

You added the hashtag to a message post in the archive. If someone replied to that message in the archive the reply would have been hashtagged also; but I think if they replied to the original

Right. It's very easy for someone to fake their way into a group, even with the new info on the geographical location, etc. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy

I was only being slightly serious! The group I moderate operates restricted membership anyway but that does not necessarily make spotting a second membership application a reliable process. Chris

Chris, Why don't you restrict membership and stop them at the gate when they try to rejoin? -- Bob Bellizzi

I agree, as owners/moderators we need to take control of our groups. If there is a need to show the difference between authoring and hijacking a message it can be accomplished by approving the

I noticed something weird about this just the other day after adding a hashtag to an already-existing topic. I haven't had time to thoroughly check it out yet but just adding my voice to "something

The replies only, are grouped together. This is what I observed after I applied the tag to the 1st subject. Its possible that after tagging the 1st post, the system now views the rest of the replies

I must confess to being a bit lost in all this, but I think I may have spotted a misunderstanding. A question: are the replies to an initial post correctly threaded below it when the topic is looked

I agree that politics are not appropriate on beta, but I read this as simply a joke and and having nothing to do with politics. To be back on topic, I'm definitely for conserving our limited worldwide

Initial post had a subject, and was later tagged. As an experiment, find the 1st post in a subject thats not been tagged, and tag it. Do all the rest of the replies now get tagged? I dont think they

1st topic didnt have a tag, and I manually added one days later. Few weeks went by, and someone replied, but the tag on all the subsequent replies to the 1st topic didnt get tied in with the tag

I'm for the moderation actually, and I don't communicate with said person, they will get an outright ban. It's not worth the trouble to even try and reason with someone whois willing to circumvent the

Not to tell anyone how to run their group, but on mine, any member who goes through this much trouble to avoid moderation proves to me that their primary purpose on the group is to cause trouble,

Can live without the political commentary, thanks. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together.