Yes, it's definitely on the TODO list. Right now, as evidenced by recent #changelogs, I'm focused on development of the App (and the API needed to support it). I'm paying a consulting group to build

From my own viewpoint that would be the easier option. Once a "troublesome member" realised that they could start a topic unmoderated, but that replies were held for moderation, they might start

Technotronic, That's because although both posts are inside the same hashtag, they have different subjects (with the first having no subject at all from what I understood).

Oh, I see. But how often do they start topics as opposed to replying to other topics? Presumably an order of magnitude less? And if so, what would be the real downside in simply putting them on

Exactly. If they start a new topic, everything is fine. It's when they use reply for a post totally unrelated to the topic they've replied to (hijacking the thread) that a problem occurs. I've got

Noticed a while back that after I tagged a post with a subject with no hashtag, with one that is related, any of the following subject replies didnt tie in to the 1st subject , even with the initial

I think the recent new types (moderating all topics a person starts and moderating the first message of all topics a person starts) make sense and are useful. I don't see the usefulness of the request

It looks like we could add an infinite number of new moderation types for an infinite number issues, where and when should we just use the basic "Override Moderated"? "And if any man shall take

Could I ask, is there any reason not to just put such members on moderation? -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can

Some time ago (Ref: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/18455), new moderation settings were established for topics that a "problem subscriber" initiates, to wit: Override: moderate the first

This may not provide the required functionality; see my #16576 of April 2018. If the requirement is for any given message (or reply for that matter) to be unambiguously from a Group Owner or Moderator

Glenn, Click New Topic. If you are a mod or owner the From address is a drop-list: select the group's +owner address. Shal https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum

I agree. I've hacked this by creating an account called [MyGroupName]Moderators and making it an owner. But it's a PITA. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy

Need a way to send the group announcements from the owner, moderator of a group.

We have similar problems, we have people either cancel at the last minute or just not even show up. We need to be able to waitlist or remove repeat offenders as many of our events our limited by the

I agree that this would be a very useful and important addition. Even with the first group event we held, we experienced people who cancelled literally in the 11th hour, a couple of whom strongly

Does the word "yet" mean this might be coming down the pike? That would be awesome if it is! :)

That's already available on the Files page. I know it includes content in PDF files, but not sure about others. Duane

Ability to search files. Awesome if included filename and content.

I'll go the opposite direction: would it be possible to specify a minimum number of attendees by a certain date or the event is automatically cancelled? Probably pie-in-the-sky. -- J Messages are