When we have to re-write the From line because of DMARC, and the group's reply-to is set to reply to sender, we set the reply-to to be the sender and we add a CC line for the group. So if someone

Yes, for me it was very easy, which is one of the reasons that I went with IO, but I have run into some SNAFU's with some of my members moving over from Yahoo or Wiggio (where they were for years).

Trish, Of course not. We were discussing allowing it by default, not requiring it. I'm curious where they're hung up, if you know. Perhaps they're over-thinking it (expecting it to be as complex as

I agree Dano. Judy SW Florida - USA

Hi Sener, <seneryelkenci@...> wrote: Yes, if you have a member list in an easy to read text format, and can show that you own the group, we'd be happy to help. You can contact

Hi I like Shal’s suggestion - Allow any service until the user either uses a social sign-in or establishes a password. Then enable only that service or none, respectively. In other words, any

I wouldn't want to force anyone to log in via a social networking login. I think that should be an option they have to select as opposed to defaulting to it. I have someone who's been trying to join

I just have an observation here. My concern is that this whole package is trying to be all things to all people and it might get too confusing on it's surface for some. I like the options and

Could we transfer our groups also from other services then YahooGroups and GoogleGroups to Groups.io . Like Groupspaces.com

Maybe it contains a risk but its easy to transfer some people from google+ and from facebook. We need this option for Yahoo and Outlook (Hotmail, msn etc.) also. SY

Mark, I guess I need to re-state that. I said: So it would be: Allow any service until the user either uses a social sign-in or establishes a password. Then enable only that service or none,

I agree. I think it should be disabled by user only when he/she first establishes a native password. -- Jim Poston@... << I want to be a veterinarian because I love children.

Mark, I forget the flow there. If they don't establish a password then yes, allow social sign-in until they either use a social sign-in or set a password. Then yes or no, respectively. In other

I'd prefer that they not be allowed to use a social login if they subscribe by email Duane

I had a thought (it happens occasionally). What about people who register via email, using groupname+subscribe@groups.io? Should they be defaulted to being able to log in via a social login? My gut

I'm ok with adding a checkbox on your profile that you can check to disable social logins. Would that work for everyone? Thanks, Mark I would use that. Cacky --- This email has been checked for

Eeep. I did some investigating and things aren't yet properly approved on the Facebook side. The login works for me, because Facebook allows that for testing, so I didn't know that it wasn't yet

Similar problem, different part of the code. Should be fixed. Thanks, Mark

Thanks for pointing this out. I just made the code smarter and it now handles this situation. Mark

There was a similar problem in a message (#2128) that Mark posted a few days ago. He inserted a link to Slack, but it links to https://groups.io/org/groupsio/beta/message/(http://slack.com) Looks