Better or worse is not the issue. Editing content typically is not conflated with creating new content. Users and readers will not have expected a minor edit to move a message to the top of the space,

Hopefully, this won't be "other media" and will be much better. Duane

I can see why you might want this in your group, then. It's the polar opposite of my group, where we have disabled editing because everyone was editing their posts many times in a row, which caused a

Well, since it's not happening, that seems like a decision! :) Seriously: I think it would be unacceptable to do this as the default. Sometimes very old messages are edited (at least in my group) to

I could see a Save Without Sending not being updated because only moderators can do that. But when an author makes the change, it must be sent, so should get a new date/time as far as positioning. I

Maybe it could be an option upon editing a message? I can see some (rare, in my group) situations where you might want to treat the edit as a new message in the sense of moving it to the top. --

I disagree with this suggestion. Often in our group, edits are very minor. And also, often they are saved without sending. Then the argument might go that you should move it up if it's saved and sent,

To clarify, I realize that actual position would depend on the sort order chosen, so an edit should cause the topic/message/expanded to be treated as if a new message had posted. Thanks again, Duane

I would like to see a message edit move the topic to the top of the archive list. It gets sent to those receiving email, but isn't noticeable to those that read online because it doesn't come to the

This really isn't the place for this type of question. On the home page, it says: "A group to discuss the Groups.io service and how it can be improved during our beta period. The Groups.io bug and

Hi all. I was wondering what the thing meant where it says that you can allow members to download the message archives in settings. Is this available for all groups and how do you do it? Thanks. From

Awesome. Thanks, Mark! -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

This change went out earlier today. Thanks, Mark

Mark, I'm still wondering about the literal request at the top of this thread, which is to not display the "You have been banned from this group" banner when a banned member tried to log on to a

Mark just informed me that this has now been fixed as well! -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

Mark writes: <I will take some of the blame for this, like my PSPTubes mention earlier today. If I ever use an acronym that isn't clear, please call me on it.> Google is our friend, at least in

Thanks, Mark. I did email you some examples. I think Notes do correctly appear in the Past Members list but didn’t use to. However, Owner Messages currently appear only in the Banned Members list,

I always thought I was special, now I know I am! Many Thanks for all you do, Mark Duane

Well, this topic has unfortunately taken on a life. I'm not sure how keeping/referring to information about past users could be considered snooping or be in any way illicit. The Past Members list is a

Chris, I don't know whether or not someone has been banned from a group falls under GDPR protection (although I doubt it does). But regardless of that, "Banned" is a strictly technical state so I