Well, this topic has unfortunately taken on a life. I'm not sure how keeping/referring to information about past users could be considered snooping or be in any way illicit. The Past Members list is a

Chris, I don't know whether or not someone has been banned from a group falls under GDPR protection (although I doubt it does). But regardless of that, "Banned" is a strictly technical state so I

While not knowing what "baking" the GDPR means I also find myself wondering if storing information about past members is breaching Data Protection Regulations of one sort or another, particularly if

I was confused, also. I believe refers to either: * watching YouTube videos on a PlayStation Portable (

LOL. We now have "nosying around," "abusing the system," "creepy," and "snooping around," all to describe a group owner's legitimate use of group content in an effort to understand how their group is

And then in the very next thread Mark used the phrase 'PSP/Tube sharing groups' in a post I assume was related to a thread over on GMF. I agree with Dano on this. I follow this group to see the

There are no “repeated requests” about why they left and that entire part of this thread is completely irrelevant. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My

OK, I see your original request and agree with that: "...request to make the info in Past Members conform to the info in Banned member list..." But I do think in the interest of transparency, that

It’s irrelevant. I may look at their history even if thy DO answer the question are. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours,

If you want to know why they leave the group, why don't you just ask them. It does seem creepy to snoop around after not telling them they were banned. Just MHO, so I would NOT be in favor of

Agree with Judy and Dano. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

ps That should have read: Dano misunderstood, but so did you. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

Dano, I totally agree with everything you have said. I have also stopped reading so many of the messages for the same reason as you. I've also when with the group for a long while. Judy F. SW

Yes, Dano misunderstood. The original request was to change something that’s seemingly a bug, or minimally an oversight, to conform with what was the majority opinion here, and Mark’s subsequent

Yes, I send the DMCA notice to the owner of the group. Right now, it's ad hoc, meaning I do it by hand. In general I just send a warning, but I am about to disable a group because they've gotten over

The original message is https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/21683. I quote it verbatim: "Is it possible to fix this but [sic] changing it back to what it was (i.e., people are not informed they're

Hello If Groups.io gets a DMCA takedown notice, do the moderators of the infracting group get sent a copy of it? Samuel

Yes for an app, see https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/21367 I suspect it's way beyond expectations to have particular integrations. If you have a premium group and some programming skills, you

Are there any plans for an APP or better still integration into TapTalk? As a mobile user i would find this much better than trying to navigate around this site.

I see a lot of piling-on here, and I don't understand why. What you're suggesting, Bruce, is what I interpreted as what J was asking for in the first place. Sometimes suggestions get lost behind more