With your logic, the entire existence and use by moderators of the past members page (available only to premium groups) must qualify as abusive nosying around as well. I’m sorry you feel that way.

Wow. This has nothing to do with punishing them for not responding. In the interest of my group, I simply want to see a record of their interaction, and any notes I or another mod might have made in

I'm gobsmacked that you use the ban function in this way. If people don't wish to respond to your goodbye message, that's their prerogative. IMO nosying around after them in other ways is

I just went in and unbanned 51 members who, as far as I could remember, had done no wrong. But it was hard to remember at this point which ones in the list had been banned for cause rather than banned

I just discovered, through a snafu in another group besides my own where I happen to be a moderator, that when someone has been banned, and they try to log in, they get a "you have been banned"

I wish messages sent to the group without subject lines did get rejected, but they don't. If they contain hashtags, the hashtags are duplicated as a pointless subject line. Drives me mad. Helen

I also prefer the original. Cacky

Changes to the site this week: CHANGE: In the activity log, we sometimes truncate long entries. We now have 'more' links to show the full entry. NEW: Added new chat API endpoints: /newchat,

These now have 'more' links. Thanks, Mark

Mark, Gerald wrote: I like today's tweaks, but it would helpful to revert the normal case (without ?test=1) back to the pre- June 25th version, to enable an apples-to-apples comparison. Shal

I second the vote to change it back to how it was. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

Sorry, but the more I look at this, the more I think that it was a mistake to change how the list of groups is displayed to users without first having the option of maintaining the list that they have

Too fast for me. Now it is. Thanks, Duane

On our test group, it's not being truncated. Still shows: Something to test the test page - a really long title to provoke the Your Groups drop list into truncation or wrapping or something. I wonder

LGTM. Best, Glenn -- We must work to make the Democratic Party the Marketplace of Ideas not the Marketplace of Favors. Virus-free. www.avast.com

That URL should be https://groups.io/groups?test=1 Thanks, Mark

Hi All, I've made some tweaks to the test version of the Your Groups dropdown (what you see when you go to https://groups.io?test=1). I'm truncating group titles at 30 characters. Also, I've fixed the

If implemented, I'd want it to be optional. Members looking to join my groups are often not too computer savvy and forget to include a subject. On the other hand, spammers never forget to include

I moved my yahoogroups to groups.io a year and a half ago. It was the best decision for groups ever. They are groups of over 3,000 for our local neighborhood and beyond and I've had people see me in

This is also something I raised a support ticket (8127) for at the end of January this year and the response I got was: So until it changes, we are in the same boat as you. It's a feature that could