|
moderated
Re: Fuzzy photos
I wish this was possible to set in the group defaults as well. It may be when Mark added this he just didn't think about adding it to group subscription defaults at the same time.
Dano
I wish this was possible to set in the group defaults as well. It may be when Mark added this he just didn't think about adding it to group subscription defaults at the same time.
Dano
|
By
D R Stinson
·
#21591
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Fuzzy photos
Annick,
There is a setting for that. Each group can have a different setting for the resolution of emailed pictures.
Admin > Settings > Max Size In Email No resizing Resized
Annick,
There is a setting for that. Each group can have a different setting for the resolution of emailed pictures.
Admin > Settings > Max Size In Email No resizing Resized
|
By
Gerald Boutin <groupsio@...>
·
#21590
·
|
|
moderated
Fuzzy photos
Some of the members of two of my groups are reporting that when they receive a message from the group with a photo attached, the photo is fuzzy. For others of us the photo is coming through just fine.
Some of the members of two of my groups are reporting that when they receive a message from the group with a photo attached, the photo is fuzzy. For others of us the photo is coming through just fine.
|
By
Annick Phillips
·
#21589
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add ability to remove or edit customized Invite text without sending invitations
And yes, I'm remembering that past thread now!
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
And yes, I'm remembering that past thread now!
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21588
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add ability to remove or edit customized Invite text without sending invitations
In other words, I see it as more than an annoyance.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
In other words, I see it as more than an annoyance.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21587
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add ability to remove or edit customized Invite text without sending invitations
I'm not sure what you mean by template, but however this is fixed, I see the most egregious problem being almost a security or privacy issue. I have never issued an invitation without a personal
I'm not sure what you mean by template, but however this is fixed, I see the most egregious problem being almost a security or privacy issue. I have never issued an invitation without a personal
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21586
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add ability to remove or edit customized Invite text without sending invitations
Yep. It's very annoying. See this previous thread on the subject https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/31364206
Go into Admin>Settings>Member Notices, open the active one of type Invite, and edit it
Yep. It's very annoying. See this previous thread on the subject https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/31364206
Go into Admin>Settings>Member Notices, open the active one of type Invite, and edit it
|
By
Bruce Bowman
·
#21585
·
|
|
moderated
Re: groups.io being "blacklisted" by windstream.net for "bad reputation"
(I just deleted my previous version of the message below because I'd forgotten to redact the member's real name. Thanks, Shal.:-)
I just emailed the member offlist using gmail, and got back a bounce
(I just deleted my previous version of the message below because I'd forgotten to redact the member's real name. Thanks, Shal.:-)
I just emailed the member offlist using gmail, and got back a bounce
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21584
·
|
|
moderated
Re: groups.io being "blacklisted" by windstream.net for "bad reputation"
typo, should read "the bounce probe I just sent also bounced"
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be
typo, should read "the bounce probe I just sent also bounced"
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21582
·
|
|
moderated
Re: groups.io being "blacklisted" by windstream.net for "bad reputation"
By the way, the bounce probe I just also bounced, with this entry:
550 5.1.1 [R2] Recipient [redacted]@windstream.net does not exist here.
Which makes you think the email address is gone, kaput.
By the way, the bounce probe I just also bounced, with this entry:
550 5.1.1 [R2] Recipient [redacted]@windstream.net does not exist here.
Which makes you think the email address is gone, kaput.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21581
·
|
|
moderated
Re: groups.io being "blacklisted" by windstream.net for "bad reputation"
No, the 'error' is what the user's service is reporting back to groups.io when it rejects a message.
Duane
No, the 'error' is what the user's service is reporting back to groups.io when it rejects a message.
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#21580
·
|
|
moderated
Re: groups.io being "blacklisted" by windstream.net for "bad reputation"
J,
That ip is a groups.io ip so it seems that groups.io is blocking output to your member, rather than the member's ip doing it.
--
Bob Bellizzi
J,
That ip is a groups.io ip so it seems that groups.io is blocking output to your member, rather than the member's ip doing it.
--
Bob Bellizzi
|
By
Bob Bellizzi
·
#21579
·
|
|
moderated
Add ability to remove or edit customized Invite text without sending invitations
I noticed today that after sending an invitation, any customized Invite text stays there until the next Invite. There is no way to edit or remove the text without sending another Invite. The only
I noticed today that after sending an invitation, any customized Invite text stays there until the next Invite. There is no way to edit or remove the text without sending another Invite. The only
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21578
·
|
|
moderated
Database Owner
#suggestion
I was trying to help troubleshoot a Database problem this morning and realized I didn't see a way to determine the owner of a Database without going to the Activity Log to find who Added Table.
I was trying to help troubleshoot a Database problem this morning and realized I didn't see a way to determine the owner of a Database without going to the Activity Log to find who Added Table.
|
By
Duane
·
#21577
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Email Privacy
Mark,
Perhaps something less than "true" would be less work, and cover most use cases, including Patti's.
I'm imagining that the "anonymous" feature could be available only to groups with Reply To
Mark,
Perhaps something less than "true" would be less work, and cover most use cases, including Patti's.
I'm imagining that the "anonymous" feature could be available only to groups with Reply To
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#21576
·
|
|
moderated
Re: groups.io being "blacklisted" by windstream.net for "bad reputation"
p.s. Mark, I will also send you the specific member activity log at support, in case that helps.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up
p.s. Mark, I will also send you the specific member activity log at support, in case that helps.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21575
·
|
|
moderated
groups.io being "blacklisted" by windstream.net for "bad reputation"
Thought I'd put this out on beta, rather than to support, to let others know: a windstream.net group member of mine is consistently bouncing, with this reason:
"550 5.7.1 [C10] RBL restriction:
Thought I'd put this out on beta, rather than to support, to let others know: a windstream.net group member of mine is consistently bouncing, with this reason:
"550 5.7.1 [C10] RBL restriction:
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21574
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Member List Synchronization Automation
#suggestion
Yes, the notion of it being a premium is a good one. I personally think it would be a big time saver for a reasonable segment of group owners.
Best,
Glenn
--
Yes, the notion of it being a premium is a good one. I personally think it would be a big time saver for a reasonable segment of group owners.
Best,
Glenn
--
|
By
Glenn Glazer
·
#21573
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Member List Synchronization Automation
#suggestion
It's kinda like the existing Slack integration, but in reverse, using the CSV file as the go-between. I would like to have such a feature, as I have similar circumstances.
Having said that, upon
It's kinda like the existing Slack integration, but in reverse, using the CSV file as the go-between. I would like to have such a feature, as I have similar circumstances.
Having said that, upon
|
By
Bruce Bowman
·
#21572
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Member List Synchronization Automation
#suggestion
A conversation about whether or not betting is helpful is equally useless.
Not at all. I have zero opinion on this and no stake whatsoever in it. I wanted to mention that it would have to be a premium
A conversation about whether or not betting is helpful is equally useless.
Not at all. I have zero opinion on this and no stake whatsoever in it. I wanted to mention that it would have to be a premium
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#21571
·
|