Hello Victoria, thank you for your comments and I agree with you. In my case there was absolutely no discussion of what was wrong between me and my co-owner I just found that I could no longer log in

Yes. 1- Fix the link to Indivisible so that it redirects properly to Indivisible :) In all of this - no one noticed that actually that link is broken. ( the www. needs to be removed) 2- Move : "Is

Maria, What difference does it make how many members have spoken up (so far)? In any (U.S. based) apolitical group there are potentially quite a few members (approximating half) that may oppose

jonathon, Luckily Thunderbird lets me search on Message ID, or I'd have been lost. Actually, I'm sort of lost anyway - that message doesn't seem to bear on my assertion about my PTA

There is nothing anyone else but Mark can do about the subject. Can we let it die???

It's telling (I think) that we continue to stray from the central issue, and continue mentoring Mark on what a certain policy change might or might not do. Focus elsewhere when you can't solve the

I’ve continued following this thread just amazed at the sheer volume of comments. I’ll add one more thought since the puppy pics haven’t appeared yet and. somewhat surprisingly, I think it

Just addressing what Ken K calls being “in your face” about supporting any particular cause: it bears keeping in mind that, as Maria points out about cause advertising, you may also garner more

Mark Following up on Shal's. Let's be honest that "advertising" or "not advertising" supporting any cause, left right or center, isn't going to make or break you or IO. However, you stated the

Mark . . . wrote: Shal has a point, but I think you could support that organization behind the scenes. Instead of advertising on GIO that you will give free premium group status to their members,

Same here. AND (sorry, caps) I don't think it will compromise profits in any way, shape, or form in any case. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My

In light of Mark's message dated 20190521 14:33:45 -0700, Message ID <CAEO096pBb3J5VbwNRsxR4ux4QTH5N=7jSueAN-aOojA4kcLe_g@...> ), can you elaborate on how that would work? jonathon

Not Shal - but some thoughts and suggestions below: Having now read the post in GMF that Ken K is referring to in his posts, and gotten over my initial annoyance with the tone of the original post in

Mark, Yes. The issue is both the nature of the organization (partisan political agenda) and it being subsidized by Groups.io as a service. No, your money is your money. I've tried to be extremely

As the postings here have shown, it´s not an easy thing… I have two examples to add to this issue: - In a Yahoo group I was a member of, the owner had “disappeared” and was not

Exactly. I am not talking about the notification box I can click when I upload a file. I am talking about an additional feature within the moderator and owner notifications such as below: my

No, they do not. It is a feature yahoo has, and since my group was moved from there, I said I miss it. Sorry for not understandable abbreviations. I was sure everyone understands s.o. as someone and

I suggest that there is nothing that can be done to the platform (groups.io) that will prevent hijacking when trust deteriorates between co-owners. Who is the "true" owner of a group? That is a pact

Not appropriate or relevant for this discussion. I'm putting this topic on moderation. Let's keep things focused please. Mark

Well Victoria, I also am not in the US. And I don't agree with him. We shake our heads and laugh at them (the U.S.), then cry, because of the blatant hypocrisy and lies (calling others 'fake' etc.)