Yeah, well, that's your opinion. :-) Bruce

When I went to groups.io earlier, it gave me what I thought was the feed page - a list of the groups I belong to, with the one I own on top. When I went to groups.io/feed, it showed me the groups I

As I have posted before. Why does making a suggestion automatically turn some into thinking it’s license to start a popularity poll??? If you have something to ADD to it, or BETTER it, or

Holly HTTPS://Groups.io is the feed page. She remembers your last choice and you’re redirected to there. So after g.io, if you go to Your Groups, that’s what will open next on g.io. If you go

Good to know. I will start doing the same. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond

For very simple things, I just email support. Mark hasn't swatted my hand about them yet...

Quite so. But in some instances proposals which might be all upside from the proposer's viewpoint might have serious downsides for others; the Law of Unintended Consequences. I don't get involved

I agree with Dano about the open-mindedness. I usually try to make evaluative statements only explicitly as my opinion, but I figure my signature covers that caveat. In the case of anonymous

Chris, in a statement that ignores how others might run their groups, stated firmly: This seems to illustrate where the beta group in the past was much more thoughtful and open-minded toward ideas. It

Hi Chris, Just to clarify, I would never even consider the idea of anonymous posts. Dreadful? It would be worse than dreadful. But I sometimes think it would be good to get honest thoughts from group

No, that's true, but I imagined that such anonymous posts would be moderated, and that the bar for having one's post approved would be quite high. I tried to make the suggestion as simple as

As a group moderator / co - owner I am most unhappy with the idea that our members could post anonymous messages of any sort to our triumvirate. It might not result in "suffering, negative

OK, I was totally confused :) I went to groups.io and assumed that would be the feed page. From there it's 2 clicks to get into a group. The actual feed page, as you obviously know :), is

I've worked on a lot of software projects, used, designed, developed, presided over a lot of different defect/suggestion systems. How well they work seems to depend more on the people who use them

Might not be a bad idea, but you may have overlooked something. There are two ways to get directly to a group from the feed page. Clicking on the group 'logo' to the left of the description or using

I just went to my feed page for the first time (nearly everything I do is via email so don't visit very often), and I rather like it. After all the discussion I thought I wouldn't - I still don't

Family comes first. Enjoy them!! Ken “You do what you can for as long as you can, and when you finally can’t, you do the next best thing. You back up but you don’t give up.” ―Chuck

Right, which is one of the many reasons I had it on my backburner as a thought and hadn't yet suggested it. When Samuel posted his "anonymous" idea, I just thought I'd mention it. -- J Messages

If this were to be implemented just wait until you get your first crank. If you can't or won't put your name to your concerns or complaints for an online group then they're not that essential. And

Brian, I totally agree with this. And with this. We seem to be on the same page now. As for the "anonymous suggestion box' idea, that's something I was thinking about proposing on a per-group basis -