I'm not sure why you have brought this topic to beta quite so soon. OK; I'll accept that finding a member who hasn't posted for a while does make things more difficult, but only slightly. To find any

I find myself needing to find some posts by a group member, which prompted the following exchange on GMF: That's where the Catch-22 begins. You can't find their messages until you've already *found*

In reviewing this topic, here is the question that arises for me, out of Tom's post in this thread: I know that if this post goes through, then Mark has read it, because the topic has timed out to

Mark, It may be as simple as working on ways to increase revenue resulting in hiring some help. Additional help would give you the bandwidth to answer most of your questions. Also, I bet that you

In the course of commenting on another topic I had occasion to review the list of hashtags for beta. Here are my notes; I think #feature, #featurerequest, #newfeaturesuggestion, #request, #suggestion,

Maria, That was not my motive. I was thinking of feed as in RSS feed. And this doesn't seem like that to me (not to mention the confusion that individual groups have RSS feeds already, those with

J, I would have said its own thread, except this one has already veered from the Pending Members list to the Members list proper. So I'd say it is ok as an extension of the issues of using "Joined"

Good, because I would like to bump it up in Mark's consciousness. :-) Do you think it merits its own thread, or has this issue already been made plain enough? I've no experience with that. And it is

J, Yes. I've no experience with that. And it is distinct enough that it probably merits a Topic of its own (if there isn't one). I've heard a rumor that the PTA unit I assist is planing to stay

I concur there. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Shal, do you also concur with the problematic title ("joined" instead of "banned") in the "banned" list, and with the (somewhat) problematic situation where past members have multiple entries in the

Mark, I concur with J that either way it goes the column header should reflect that choice: "Applied" or "Approved"; saving "Joined" for unrestricted groups. But since you asked, I also concur with

Tee-hee. ;) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

It's not there and this gets requested every couple of months. It's planned and on the Todo list. Meanwhile you have to use the Bcc feature when you send the message. -- J Messages are the sole

I thought as much, but checking that page doesn’t show anything of the sort, unless I’m again, missing something obvious.

Is this about logging an activity event or the actual message? I read the topic subject as looking for a saved copy of messages on groups.io instead of / or in addition to the BCC option that already

That would make more sense to me as it as the point of approval that a member can effectively join in with group communications. Andy

I'm happy with either. Generally I don't need better resolution than a month for this field, and Applied and Joined dates are not far enough apart to make any significant difference. - Mark I.

Maybe I should say the mythical notification overhaul. It seems to be low priority. 🙃 -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in

This is on the Todo list for the notification overhaul. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human