Mark, Yay! Shal

Indeed. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Why choose to sign up to use a medium, intentionally designed as a fusion of e-mail list and online forum, if you adamantly don't want one half of

I don't think that's possible in groups.io. It really goes against the model. Even if you have no footers, people can always log onto the site. Etc. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

There would probably need to be at least an unsubscribe link, or it would cause problems. If you want an email reflector list with absolutely no web presence, there may be better options than

Hi, I’d say this is something that could be useful for premium groups. Cheers, Joseph

We sure would like "no footer links" whatsoever in our PAID group. Want a PURE email group, with no member ever learning there is an "online interface" whatsoever. Can G.io add a PRICE POINT

Dont know if this helps but I have set up my databases and have no problem with column size. I leave the 'Display Width' option set at 0 (default) for each column. Some of my columns have a lot of

Problem: Collapsing "Advanced Settings for Email Aliases" section hides error messages. This has to do with setting an Email Alias (from the Account settings page). This is an offshoot of other

That will be awesome. I am convinced that about half our pending members never receive the notice with the questionnaire, and I've frankly given up trying to contact people offlist when that occurs.--

As an aside, this is a big reason I want to complete the app and add unread message tracking (ie Groups.io Inbox). I cannot control a lot of the experience of reading messages with the various email

It is not the case after all, you're right. I missed the little "+1" in the "To" field. Anyway, this is very discouraging. In light of this, I can't use either the reply-to-sender or the

J Because you're composing the reply in Gmail. They populate the To and CC fields of the reply using their own rules and settings to choose content from the original message's fields (From, To, CC,

Shal, yes, that appears to be the problem. However, I still don’t understand why ‘reply only to sender’ uses the gmail setting (whatever the person has it set to, even if they, like me, are

J, I see you found the Gmail option to have the default Reply behavior be Reply All. If that option is chosen then the reply arrow at the top of the message does Reply All, and the buttons on the

..and for the record, I had neither box checked when I ran the test. Will try more tests later today. Seems like "reply all" might be the gmail default if neither box is checked.-- J Messages are

"just found" -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

I just a gmail setting called "default reply behavior, reply or reply all" and will try to find time today to see how this interacts with the groups.io settings. This might be the key to the problem,

p.s. I did report this to support as a bug at least a year ago, but eventually gave up on it, thought it might be due to "disable other reply options," etc. So I'm glad it's coming up now.--

No, and that's the issue. The user just hits "reply" and gets the bounce message. This is using gmail. Not sure what happens with other email addresses but I seem to recall that it was a universal

J -- I created a hashtag with #replyonlytosender in ShalsTest and am not seeing the behavior you describe. If I simply hit reply using my email client, it automatically populates my own address. The