I had no problem with submitting my survey on a July 2017 MacBook Pro with a fully updated High Sierra (OS 10.13.6) and Safari 11.1.2 - I just checked and see I can update Safari to 12.0 and so will

Yes I am using a screen reader something car voiceover. Which is apples screenwriter are iPhones, and MacBook computers would it be a problem to use survey monkey? I know I can fill out this form on

It all worked fine here Joseph using Palemoon. Thanks Mark. Dave http://davesergeant.com

Hi Joseph, Unfortunately I don't have answers for you; I'm just using Google Forms. You're using a screenreader? I'm surprised there would be issues. Mark

Mark, I just tried to take your survey using the latest version of Mac OS what is high Sierra at the moment. Was wondering, why can't we type and numbering for the first question? The answer box has

I will "third" the agreement with Duane. If one wishes to ban, as in permanently remove someone, then do it. If one wants to put them on notice and on a short leash then the group owner or a moderator

Received from Duane at 9/17/2018 01:46 PM UTC: Amen!!! I don't think there's any substitute for direct contact with members who behave so badly that suspension or banning - two entirely different

Hi All, I'm looking for feedback that will help me prioritize feature development, and have put together a short survey. If you're a Groups.io owner or moderator, I would appreciate it if you could

JohnF, If you’re talking about which parts of the group they have access to, etc., then you’re not talking about removing them, let alone banning them. You’re talking about some sort of

I agree 100% with Duane on this. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

I have seen temporary bans used effectively in general discourse forums where one or two members start posting in a heated discussion, and they really just need some time to calm down. It turns off

For 'problem' users, I put them on moderation and send them the Group Guidelines. Very effective since their posts won't make it to the group unless I approve them, and I can reject one (or more)

A lot of this is semantics. And there is no required user notification for when they're banned or even removed from a group - each group can already set its own notification, or have none. I assume

Sure it can be done that way too. But suspended membership is more likely administrative measure but ban is punishment measure. Difference is in the message user gets when his access is limited or

Its not that black and white. Temporary banning is actually effective measure to let people know that they have to behave properly. Some call it temporary banning, some call it warnings. It is not

I agree with Duane that I would never want a temporary ban. However, maybe you mean something like "suspend membership," which I recently suggested

This request is for the ability to unmoderate a topic, meaning that every post in the topic would not require approval, even in a moderated group, and even by members on moderated status. It could be

You can easily un-ban a person if you change your mind. (I would never do so because anyone that is banned will never be allowed back.) No reason that I can see to use valuable programming time on

When Member List is downloaded it does not contain Notes info. It would be very useful to have it as it is used to store additional info about user. I am aware that notes is multi line data which may

It would be good to have an option to temporarily ban member, meaning ban would be automatically removed after set period expires.