I know the shortest amount of time is 1 day to lock a topic unless I go in and do it manually. Now I am computer illiterate. I really don't know what a hashtag is I don't understand what needs to

Ilene -- You can set up a hashtag that -- when used -- locks the topic as soon as it is posted. You can also set up your group to require hashtags, and also set it up so only Moderators can create

My groups were functioning fine in Yahoo groups as an email based group. The only reason for my switch to IO was because one group depended upon the mail to be sent immediately where yahoo had many

Ilene, I don't know what a signature tag request is but it sounds like groups.io may not be a good fit for these offer announcements. Even email is not a good mechanism as there is no way to ensure

I don't know if this has been addressed or not. I know that the shortest amount of time that a message can be locked is 1 day if it isn't locked manually sooner. Is there any way a selection could

Mark, I have two goals: 1) Prevent abuse posted to a group such as that I reported to support 8/11. This is where a malcontent or crook uses credentials at an otherwise legit mailbox provider to

I'm fine with that, too. Our messages are not very long anyway, and all we really need to see is the gist of the message. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy

Hi All, It's been a couple of days since the unplanned downtime on Tuesday. Here's a summary of what happened and what I've done to address it. What Happened I was paged at approximately 6:50am on

Mark, That is a great compromise. Thank you! Peace, Tom Vail Chairman of the Board,Canyon Ministries

I think having everything logged in one place, with the option of the amount of detail displayed, is a better option. Peace, Tom

Hi All, I've changed it so that it only displays the first couple of lines of the message. Please let me know if that works for you. Thanks, Mark

Another idea would be to have a dedicated "direct add" page, just like there's now an "invite" page, and log the messages only there in both cases.-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

Mark, If that is true, I BEG you to at least make it an option to include the message in the log, We use the log daily and send out an extensive direct add message. This change makes the log just

Could be because a few days ago I asked Mark for direct-add messages to be logged, just as invite messages are, for consistency. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the

All of a sudden we have the full email message showing up in the activity log when we do a direct add. This is what it looks like: Did the same thing a few days ago and got this one liner: I don't

It might be worth talking to the folk at FastMail. They are pretty active in the mail security standards. I use them for my mail. https://www.fastmail.com/about/company.html wunder Walter

Honestly not sure what, if anything, to do with SPF and DKIM. Seeing plenty of valid emails with bad DKIM sigs, for example. Mark

Received from Mark Fletcher at 8/23/2018 05:09 AM UTC: Don't bounce! REJECT during the SMTP transaction if possible. And if not possible, then just blackhole it. For viruses I'd prefer deletion.

I am 100% in favor of reject and not bouncing. If you want more info - read on here: http://www.dontbouncespam.org/ -- Gerald

I would lean toward dropping rather than bouncing spam/malware/phishing, just because the system on the other end might misclassify groups.io as the source of the malware. If you do bounce it for