I think there is one case where this might not be true and something for Mark, et. al. to think about. I know that there is a thread in this group regarding AOL marking everything as SPAM from

You are correct, I did not understand your statement. I still prefer to give the group owner the ability to say "I would like my group to appear as X to all my members" instead of having to deal with

Pete, You misunderstand. I mean for that option to apply to messages TO that subscriber, not FROM them. My thought is that users whose email service has this characteristic might want to be able to

I like all but 3 should not be a premium/enterprise option. I would want it for my basic group which got transferred from Y! groups for 3 reasons: 1. There are over 700 members comprised of people

How about both a group setting and an individual setting? 1. If a user is using a known-must-munge site like yahoo.com, the checkbox is on the user's settings, checked, and grayed out (disabled). 2.

I hadn't actually thought about that. But now, you can also export the activity logs. It's a HTML file, one log entry per line. Exporting a group also generates an activity log event. Thanks, Mark

I disagree since the reason it exists at all now is because it is beyond the individual user's control (DMARC accommodation). Also, the individual user doesn't know that someone else has an SPF

I would use a more generic "Only use this feature if you have had complaints from users about blocked emails or emails marked as SPAM for no apparent reason." I believe this extends beyond Exchange

I think that would be better as an account option that could be enabled by the affected recipients, similar to the Message-ID munging option (I always want copies of my own messages) for Gmail users.

Bruce, Please try again, it should be fixed now. Thanks, Mark

Thank you for that explanation! This has been something that I've been dealing with for a year now, and I was unable to get an explanation of what was going on from anyone, mainly because I think most

We have a number of users who are either using email via on-premise Exchange, hosted Exchange, or Office 365 business/enterprise. Exchange checks both the envelope-From address (SMTP FROM) and the

Whether or not it's limited to a specific browser, and whether or not someone knows that detail, it's a bug and does not belong in beta. If it was a user issue ("how do I edit") it likewise does not

Unless he had a range of other Browsers available the fact that the problem was limited to Safari might not be immediately obvious., Claws away, please! Chris

Well, just bring informative since there are a lot of new people here (including you, I think?) If the edit function is broken ( which it is in safari) I don’t think anyone could interpret it as

Perhaps he didn't realise it was a bug. Chris

ps Bugs are supposed to be reported to support, not beta. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond

That’s a Safari link issue thst Mark is working on fixing. For now, do a right click to open the link in another window or tab, or use a different browser. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of

When I go to the Hashtag tab, I see the box for each of my hashtags and the edit button seems hot, but when I click on it it goes to the messages under that tag. It does not open the edit screen?

Ronaldo wrote: I’m not sure what the difference in the end result is. Ideally our users would reply in a format similar to this post but they are either unable to do so or unable to learn. PS, the