You would do that as Jeremy said, in post https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/14667 Here's a step by step: 1. Go to the calendar page 2. Click on the event that is wrong event opens in a new

Ok tank you that is what I want to do but not sure how and I can not find the delete or where to go to edit. Do I go to "add event?" Your support is

Hi Jeremy Thank you but I think there is some ay to edit as it was mentioned;however I can not find where to find this edit and no where do I hear delete I have tried to contact Mark but nothing

You can't delete a calendar, only the events shown on it, individually. Duane

While I am prepared to be be contradicted by someone with more expertise, I do not believe that it is possible to delete (as distinct from disable) the calendar other than by deleting your group: as I

No I need to delete the current calender that I have on right now. sugar Your support is appreciated: https://www.gofundme.com/sugars-transplant-journey “You are chosen, holy, and

While I can see where you're coming from, that (only be allowed on groups that aren't in the directory (totally private)) is not a limitation that I would worry about. While they may or may not be

Do you mean '+Event' and 'Subscribe to Calendar'? Those are on the 'Calendar' page. You need to navigate from that to the 'View Event' page, by clicking on the event (the incorrect one) in the

I think what's an ad, vs. what's information (and the two can obviously intersect), is part of the issue. But I was about to suggest just the above. Moderators can edit posts however they see fit.

I'd suggest that if this is added, it only be allowed on groups that aren't in the directory (totally private). Otherwise, it sort of defeats the reason for having the group listed. Duane

Anyone can remove any of the ads, whether seen or not. I don't want free advertising to be used on my groups, regardless of the source or "reasons". As Bob B. mentioned, I don't think it will be

I'd like to request a new option for group owners - to disable any/all signups for a group. I see two scenarios for this: Where membership is controlled through the API or another method (e.g.

That's a good point. But I still think the fact that they don't see it visually, and they can't modify it, makes for an important qualitative difference in the two situations. -- J Messages are

That makes two of us. :) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu

You quote the example of a user wanting to brag about his iPhone and hence wanting the signature. The same can be said for the Avast 'ad' in that some users know that Avast adds this (even though they

We'll leave it at that with agreement about difference of opinion. You are right; Mark doesn't need another endless argument about angels on a pinhead. Just an ancient programmer venting. -- Bob

In other words, think this is the qualitative and very important difference. You can argue that they "send" both, but visually, they don't. They never see the AV ads. -- J Messages are the

Doesn't matter. It's a fine line when you start removing "sent from my iPhone" but not "sent from my frigging iPhone" just because the user has changed one slightly but not the other, and that's the

I view "sent from my Iphone", and others like it that are specifically put in by the OS or the hardware manufacturer and requiring specific removal by the user of the device as blatant advertising.

Absolutely agree. I think it should be passed through even if they haven't modified it. Not modifying it is a form of modifying it: it's the form of "I am leaving this alone because I want it to be