Ooops! I'm dumb. Turns out the wiki totally accepts drag and drop images. Works very nicely, and they can be resized easily. It didn't when I first tried it, but works fine when I tried it on a

"(this reminds me of a future feature I'd like to add, something that helps people create summaries of threads)" Missed this before, but it sounds very interesting. Seems like it would be quite

Hi John, Thank you for commenting. I am more familiar with the Mac than I am with the PC, although, I can handle Windows XP, to a certain extent. I will pass along your suggestion. If there are

Thanks for that explanation, Shal. I have no knowledge of how many pixels there are across the screen of a smart phone or tablet, and assumed it must be fairly large to be useable. From what you

I think a dedicated database section is best as well. In addition to it's popularity and familiarity, the tools that can be leveraged in a database-exclusive section would not be restricted by any

Besides having a way to revert to a previous version of a Wiki page, I feel that having changes be moderated might prevent some problems. Many folks aren't familiar with how a wiki works, including

"You have been subscribed to the new group using your Yahoo account settings" They are not "Yahoo-account settings". They are..well.. message delivery preferences like you (=user) used them in the

On a somewhat related item, YG has/had a setting to disallow invitations. I think this could be useful at times. The invitation and add functions should be separate options. Duane

As much as I hate that, I don't think it can be banned without pissing off a load of people who prefer it that way Yes, and that's why I request an (optional!!) autotrim-feature like some

Sure Having a poll-feature would be nice too

Thanks Cacky - got it now! KnyttWytch (so much to do, so little

Hi Mark, I'd prefer the image centered over the text below it. https://groups.io/org/groupsio/1A-Travelzine I think Message History is knocking the page out of whack. Can you put the cells closer

Shal wrote:>>The weird thing is that Brenda claims that her reply to me was made through owlperch, yet posted to beta. There's absolutely no mention of beta, nor ID of any beta messages, in the header

Mark, Wouldn't this be an ordinary result with a cross-posted reply? Cross-posting ought to be more commonly forwarded messages than replies, but _users do the darndest things_ (to paraphrase Art

Interesting information. And in many ways I agree. :) However, the people we are trying to bring over here will be completely confused by tje term archive. Add that to the fact that every thing else

Mark, Interesting. Looking at the View Source in both groups, the header fields have byte-identical content, which makes sense I guess given that they came in on the same connection. Identical ID

Can I add a "like" or a "+1" to John's message? 8-) dg

Okay - I think that's easy to do without having Mark program it. If you are replying from your own email program, then you can set your preferences. If from the web site - if he has it set to bottom

One of the definitions of archive (words often have a number of meanings) is: "a collection of information permanently stored on the

No idea. I would have her try a full-on https://groups.io and also make sure she's not typing a ".com" on the end. I'm sure there's a way to get Chrome to come up with some diagnostics explaining