Date   

moderated Re: Downgrading to monthly billing overcharges #bug

Duane
 

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 04:39 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
Mark said if you’re legacy and you switch from monthly to yearly, you keep the legacy pricing.
BUT, if later switch back to monthly, you lose it (as things are now.)

Duane


moderated Re: Downgrading to monthly billing overcharges #bug

 

Bruce, 
Mark said if you’re legacy and you switch from monthly to yearly, you keep the legacy pricing.


On Oct 9, 2020, at 2:01 PM, Bruce Bowman <bruce.bowman@...> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:08 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
You would not start to be charged monthly until your year was up, April 24, 2021. When you switched to monthly, you should have seen a confirmation dialog that said "Switch to monthly billing at $20/month? You will be billed on 4/24/21."
There was no such confirmation dialog (that I noticed).

When you then switched to yearly billing, you should have seen a confirmation dialog that said "Switch to yearly billing at $220/year? You will be billed immediately."
Again, no. Is this done as a popup? I have a popup blocker on my browser.

For legacy premium groups, if you switch from monthly to yearly billing, you keep the legacy pricing. If you switch from yearly to monthly, it goes to the $20/month pricing. If you downgrade to free and then upgrade later, you will be at the new pricing. I believe this is consistent with how other services work (you could make the argument that switching from monthly to yearly should trigger the new pricing for consistency as well, I suppose).
A lot of groups signed up for a year of Premium in order to get transferred. Those agreements are expiring now (Oct 22), and this is a new twist that some didn't see coming.

The inquiry made in GMF was whether a legacy group could switch to monthly at $10/month. The one posing the question wanted to keep his Premium features without having quickly do some fundraising (or front the money and get reimbursed). 

A related [and perhaps rhetorical] question:  If J was to change her plan to Premium Yearly (she's currently on month-to-month), would her payment be $220? To be honest, I see little reason why a group on legacy Premium shouldn't be able to freely switch between monthly and annual billing without penalty...as long as they never drop down to Basic.

I have refunded your $220 charge and rolled back your next invoice date to April 24, 2021. The refund will appear on your statement in 5-10 days. In addition, I have reverted your annual price to $110.
Thanks Mark...I was confident that you would treat me right.

Regards,
Bruce

--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Downgrading to monthly billing overcharges #bug

Bruce Bowman
 

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:08 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
You would not start to be charged monthly until your year was up, April 24, 2021. When you switched to monthly, you should have seen a confirmation dialog that said "Switch to monthly billing at $20/month? You will be billed on 4/24/21."
There was no such confirmation dialog (that I noticed).

When you then switched to yearly billing, you should have seen a confirmation dialog that said "Switch to yearly billing at $220/year? You will be billed immediately."
Again, no. Is this done as a popup? I have a popup blocker on my browser.

For legacy premium groups, if you switch from monthly to yearly billing, you keep the legacy pricing. If you switch from yearly to monthly, it goes to the $20/month pricing. If you downgrade to free and then upgrade later, you will be at the new pricing. I believe this is consistent with how other services work (you could make the argument that switching from monthly to yearly should trigger the new pricing for consistency as well, I suppose).
A lot of groups signed up for a year of Premium in order to get transferred. Those agreements are expiring now (Oct 22), and this is a new twist that some didn't see coming.

The inquiry made in GMF was whether a legacy group could switch to monthly at $10/month. The one posing the question wanted to keep his Premium features without having quickly do some fundraising (or front the money and get reimbursed). 

A related [and perhaps rhetorical] question:  If J was to change her plan to Premium Yearly (she's currently on month-to-month), would her payment be $220? To be honest, I see little reason why a group on legacy Premium shouldn't be able to freely switch between monthly and annual billing without penalty...as long as they never drop down to Basic.

I have refunded your $220 charge and rolled back your next invoice date to April 24, 2021. The refund will appear on your statement in 5-10 days. In addition, I have reverted your annual price to $110.
Thanks Mark...I was confident that you would treat me right.

Regards,
Bruce


moderated Re: Downgrading to monthly billing overcharges #bug

 

Hi Bruce,

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:18 PM Bruce Bowman <bruce.bowman@...> wrote:
In response to an inquiry in GMF, I downgraded my plan from Premium yearly (legacy $110) to Premium monthly for our group ias-indy. I did this on the premise that the downgrade would not actually occur until my paid-up plan period was completed.


You would not start to be charged monthly until your year was up, April 24, 2021. When you switched to monthly, you should have seen a confirmation dialog that said "Switch to monthly billing at $20/month? You will be billed on 4/24/21."

 
Imagine my surprise when not only did the downgrade happen immediately, when I switched back I was immediately charged another $220!

When you then switched to yearly billing, you should have seen a confirmation dialog that said "Switch to yearly billing at $220/year? You will be billed immediately." You were then billed for a year immediately, at $220, and your next billing date was incremented from April 24, 2021 to April 24, 2022.

For legacy premium groups, if you switch from monthly to yearly billing, you keep the legacy pricing. If you switch from yearly to monthly, it goes to the $20/month pricing. If you downgrade to free and then upgrade later, you will be at the new pricing. I believe this is consistent with how other services work (you could make the argument that switching from monthly to yearly should trigger the new pricing for consistency as well, I suppose).

I have refunded your $220 charge and rolled back your next invoice date to April 24, 2021. The refund will appear on your statement in 5-10 days. In addition, I have reverted your annual price to $110.

Please let me know if there's anything I can do to make things more clear. I'm certainly not trying to fool anyone.

Thanks,
Mark


moderated Re: Downgrading to monthly billing overcharges #bug

Bruce Bowman
 

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 08:37 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
Question unrelated to your issue: how is yearly to monthly payment a downgrade?
I called it that only for lack of a better term. 

I have been paying monthly (legacy $10) since forever and (mostly out of laziness) have never switched to yearly.
I thought the "downgrade" would temporarily take me to what you have -- $10/month -- but it didn't. That was exactly the basis for the GMF inquiry that I was investigating.

I was never aware there was any difference in features. Is there, since you’re calling it a downgrade?
Not that I noticed, but I frankly got a little alarmed, and didn't remain there long enough to really check it out.

Regards,
Bruce


moderated Re: Downgrading to monthly billing overcharges #bug

 

Question unrelated to your issue: how is yearly to monthly payment a downgrade? I have been paying monthly (legacy $10) since forever and (mostly out of laziness) have never switched to yearly. I waa never aware there was any difference in features. Is there, since you’re calling it a downgrade?


On Oct 8, 2020, at 5:18 PM, Bruce Bowman <bruce.bowman@...> wrote:

In response to an inquiry in GMF, I downgraded my plan from Premium yearly (legacy $110) to Premium monthly for our group ias-indy. I did this on the premise that the downgrade would not actually occur until my paid-up plan period was completed.

Imagine my surprise when not only did the downgrade happen immediately, when I switched back I was immediately charged another $220!

Please refund my $220 and reinstate me into the Premium yearly legacy plan to expire April 24, 2021.

Thanks,
Bruce

--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Downgrading to monthly billing overcharges #bug

Bruce Bowman
 

In response to an inquiry in GMF, I downgraded my plan from Premium yearly (legacy $110) to Premium monthly for our group ias-indy. I did this on the premise that the downgrade would not actually occur until my paid-up plan period was completed.

Imagine my surprise when not only did the downgrade happen immediately, when I switched back I was immediately charged another $220!

Please refund my $220 and reinstate me into the Premium yearly legacy plan to expire April 24, 2021.

Thanks,
Bruce


moderated Re: receiving owner emails even though "owner emails" set to "none" #bug

 

Nope. It looks like she sent it directly to the group after being approved, for some reason. But good to know.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: receiving owner emails even though "owner emails" set to "none" #bug

Bruce Bowman
 

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 06:51 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
I had received a response to a pending member notice in that group ,which normally would just be an owner email, but for some reason it had actually posted it to the group.
Was it from a btinternet.com address? Under some circumstances btinternet.com strips the +owner part of the address and the message gets sent to the group instead.

More details at https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/topic/34125793 

Regards,
Bruce


moderated Re: receiving owner emails even though "owner emails" set to "none" #bug

 

Mark, forget about it. I had received a response to a pending member notice in that group ,which normally would just be an owner email, but for some reason it had actually posted it to the group. So it was a group message. I just ran a test of sending an owner email to the group myself and did not receive it.
No bug.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: receiving owner emails even though "owner emails" set to "none" #bug

 

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 03:30 PM, Bruce Bowman wrote:
Could you be confusing +owner emails with notifications
No.
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: receiving owner emails even though "owner emails" set to "none" #bug

Bruce Bowman
 

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 05:43 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
I just went into my subscription in one of the groups I'm a moderator in to set my "owner emails" to "none," but it was already set to that even though I've been receiving owner emails. Possibly a small glitch there.
Could you be confusing +owner emails with notifications? I get them turned around in my head sometimes.

Bruce


moderated receiving owner emails even though "owner emails" set to "none" #bug

 

I just went into my subscription in one of the groups I'm a moderator in to set my "owner emails" to "none," but it was already set to that even though I've been receiving owner emails. Possibly a small glitch there. (I have not been receiving owner emails lately in another group I'm a mod in, which was also already set to "none"; but I don't think there have been any recently in that group, or at least since I set it to "none.")
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Following a new topic sends out catch-up emails with missing group [Subject Tag] #bug

 

Hi Mark,

I don't think it's Gmail doing that, as my other account (this main one, Exchange-hosted) also does it, and IIRC from back then, a Yahoo test account also did. 

Unless if you already checked that part of the code, it looks like the Send Follow-up code bit is using the original sent-in email subject field to populate the catch-up email subject, not the "processed/posted" one that went out with the tag added, and it may have to do with whether one replied to the topic through email or online, IIRC catch-up messages from the same person would exhibit this; or, the code is just "forwarding" the original message as it came in, not as it "posted" on the topic archive, if that makes sense.  And it only happens when catch-up messages are being sent right after following an unfollowed-before topic, not under normal-flow (send-after-posted) follow messages.

Please give me a bit of time to follow a couple of new topics and generate the catch-up messages and do some research; there's got to be some pattern to this that should help point out what's going on.

Cheers,
Christos



On 2020-10-06 16:59, Mark Fletcher via groups.io wrote:
The code looks ok to me. This could be a case of Gmail stripping out the display of the subject tag. Can you look at the one of the original messages and verify that it does not have the group subject tag?

Thanks,
Mark


moderated To Do List #suggestion

Wayne Swearingen
 

Unless there's a way currently, I'd like to suggest a "To-do List" feature. I searched and did not find any previous discussion points. If I missed the discussion please let me know. 

Would be nice to have checkbox options for when an item is complete, with the option to send an email to the list author or anyone subscribed, as well as who "completed" the work (or checked the box anyway). 


Wayne


moderated Re: Past Members on Mobile are Garbled #bug

 

Hello,

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 9:18 AM Raphael Vowles on IO via groups.io <raphaelvowles=yahoo.co.uk@groups.io> wrote:
A bug - Past Members on Mobile are Garbled
Please take a look at this one and fix it when convenient. Yes - it is obscure but easily fixed.

This should be fixed now.

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Re: Following a new topic sends out catch-up emails with missing group [Subject Tag] #bug

 

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 12:39 PM Christos G. Psarras <christos@...> wrote:
Just an update since that time, the problem still persists.


The code looks ok to me. This could be a case of Gmail stripping out the display of the subject tag. Can you look at the one of the original messages and verify that it does not have the group subject tag?

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Past Members on Mobile are Garbled #bug

 

A bug - Past Members on Mobile are Garbled
Please take a look at this one and fix it when convenient. Yes - it is obscure but easily fixed.

Problem> The display for Past Members is garbled when shown on a mobile phone display.
See attached screenshot. 

  • Symptom 1. The email address is obscured by the link "History"
  • Symptom 2. The link "History" is misplaced and obscures the email address
  • Symptom 3. The "Date Left" is simply not shown on the mobile version of the display

Thanks for looking. Raphael


moderated Re: Minor display bug in SEARCH-Members screens when editing a member #bug

Bruce Bowman
 

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 01:49 PM, Christos G. Psarras wrote:
F5-refreshing the page refreshes the list contents and they now agree with the changes.  Not doing so, and continuing to (test-) edit that member (thinking one must have not made the change, so go back to check/redo it), results in a "one-page behind in display results" scenario, where the underlying code correctly does its thing, but the list display code seems to display the next to the last changes.
This is something of an insidious problem for a handful of groups.io operations. Deleting photos from a photo album does the same thing...the photos in the album are renumbered, but the thumbnails served from the browser cache are not.

I've gotten into the habit of doing a Ctrl-F5 whenever something doesn't "look right," but I suspect many others have yet to learn that trick. If the reload can be forced from the server side under such circumstances that would be a good thing (yes, I know it's been asked for before).

Regards,
Bruce


moderated Re: #bug in member search #bug #fixed

Bob Bellizzi
 

Thank you, Mark!
The only final  issue I have is that 
If one is looking for the number of hits, besides all of the actual hits,
They must issue the search twice, with an interveng change in their Profile preferences,
Once for the quantity and once for getting the full list if it's long.
In this case it runs into the hundreds of Topics because he is a top dog specialist with an international practice.
--

Bob Bellizzi

2921 - 2940 of 29121