Date   

moderated Re: Search Function Error in Messages after Yahoo Transfer

RCardona
 

On 10/26/19 10:55 AM, Gerald Boutin wrote:
With all of the new groups being transferred, it may well be that it is going to take some time for the indexing to catch up. Searching has worked with all of the groups that I have had transferred, so hopefully it just a matter of being patient.
 
--
Gerald
_._,_._,_

It is now about 12 hours since completion of the transfer, and as Gerald surmised, indexing is merely lagging.  The main page Message History is beginning to fill in and the search function is now pulling results.   Thanks for the heads up Gerald!!

R. Cardona


moderated Re: Search Function Error in Messages after Yahoo Transfer

Gerald Boutin <groupsio@...>
 

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 02:35 AM, RCardona wrote:
After a successful transfer of our Yahoo Group (THANKS MARK!!!), when one attempts a search within the cloned messages, no results get pulled.  Instead it only says "The search produced no results."   Is there a feature needed that integrates transferred messages into the search engine?

R. Cardona
With all of the new groups being transferred, it may well be that it is going to take some time for the indexing to catch up. Searching has worked with all of the groups that I have had transferred, so hopefully it just a matter of being patient.
 
--
Gerald


moderated Re: Search Function Error in Messages after Yahoo Transfer

 

The answer to this is also very very important to me. 
Susan B


On Oct 26, 2019, at 1:35 AM, RCardona <rcardona3451@...> wrote:

After a successful transfer of our Yahoo Group (THANKS MARK!!!), when one attempts a search within the cloned messages, no results get pulled.  Instead it only says "The search produced no results."   Is there a feature needed that integrates transferred messages into the search engine?

R. Cardona


moderated Re: Transfer invites

Technotronic Dimensions
 

I did invite the "transfer@" address to join as a member of the YAHOO group, but as of 2 days later that user does not seem to be there.

Also wanted to know, is it possible to merge another group, (into the same group.io)  once one was already merged? Or is it possible to merge
one into a sub group? The sub group possibility seems interesting to me because the 2nd yahoo group I want to merge is more or less an "archive"
type now, because theres no activity to it much anymore for years, but the email posts can be a useful resource to have access to.


moderated Search Function Error in Messages after Yahoo Transfer

RCardona
 

After a successful transfer of our Yahoo Group (THANKS MARK!!!), when one attempts a search within the cloned messages, no results get pulled.  Instead it only says "The search produced no results."   Is there a feature needed that integrates transferred messages into the search engine?

R. Cardona


moderated power shutdowns in Northern California this weekend

 

Mark,

Are you in the area of the planned power blackouts over the weekend, Saturday evening through Monday afternoon? I've heard that it will hit nearly all counties in the SF Bay Area (it is definitely hitting mine). It occurred to me to wonder, given the possible effect on all the yahoo transfers.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
Note on an occupational hazard: I comment frequently in beta based on my desire for the betterment of groups.io as a product. Only a fraction of the time are my comments and suggestions specifically a matter of self-interest. Don't assume the latter when the former may be the case.


moderated Transfer invites

 

Hi All,

If you have started a Yahoo Group transfer, and the status is the message that starts "Make sure you have sent an invite to your group", that means that we have not received your invite yet and that you should send another one. That message will change automatically when we receive the invite and is not subject to the delays in other parts of the process are seeing.

Thanks,
Mark


moderated Option to Moderate Files and Folders

Janis
 

I was just in the moderation settings in my Yahoo groups and noticed an option I wish I had used before, an option to moderate photo uploads by members.  To save storage, it is best to only allow some types of photos that fit the group and do not break copyright laws.

Also, in my old group at Yahoo, I found a couple of files with incorrect lineage where DNA tests have proven there is no connection. There could be other issues with file uploads. And again, to save storage, I want to moderate file uploads before they are added to our files section.

Could we have moderating of file and photo uploads added to our group manager options, please?

Yahoo does not have the file moderation option.
This is what I see in moderation settings at Yahoo.
Control photos or messages to be scrutinized, also have a check on the new-members activities
 
Messages :
Moderated
 
Unmoderated
 
Moderated for new members
 
 
Enable approval before posting message to group. Choose 'Moderated for new members' if you want to enable moderation for members that join the group after this setting is enabled
Photos :
Moderated
 
Unmoderated
 
Enable approval before posting Photos to group


moderated Re: Change in group transfer queue sorting algorithm

Harm Selling <h.selling@...>
 

Mark,

Thank you for correcting this problem.

Since the correction the waiting queue is not growing anymore, but shrinking, as it should do.
Slowly, but I understand importing a lot of data takes time.

I'm glad that the problem (being moved backwards in the queue) now appears to be recognized, and the end of waiting is in sight.


I'm happy again!


---

Harm Selling
http://genealogiegroningen.nl
http://genealogiewinschoten.nl

http://genealogiestrating.nl

 

Van: main@beta.groups.io <main@beta.groups.io> Namens Mark Fletcher
Verzonden: vrijdag 25 oktober 2019 1:04
Aan: beta@groups.io
Onderwerp: [beta] Change in group transfer queue sorting algorithm

 

Hi All, 

 

After some consideration, I've changed how the groups in the transfer queue are being sorted, in an effort to make things more fair.

 

Previously, transfer requests were sorted by when they were initially created.

 

Now, transfer requests are sorted by when the go ahead is given to transfer the group.

 

Figuring things out as I go.....

 

Thanks,

Mark


moderated Re: Migrate Groups to Subgroups

West Coast Compañeros Staff
 



On 10/25/19 7:15 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:25 AM West Coast Compañeros Staff <westcoastcompaneros@...> wrote:


We have accepted the invite to your group. Before we can transfer your group, you must upgrade it to the Premium Yearly option. Once you've done that, return here and you will be able to give the go ahead to transfer.

This should be fixed now.

Thanks,
Mark
(normally beta@ is not for bug reports, but as this feature was just discussed here, I approved the message)

Thanks very much, Mark. The plans for all the subgroups now correctly display Premium Yearly. I did originally submit this report to support@groups.io, but, after not getting a response (understandably given your workload), I decided to try posting this to beta so that I could get the problem in front of your eyes somehow. I apologize for the breach of protocol.

Robert R.


moderated Re: 2 questions about the Yahoo Group transfer

Janis
 

I only have two members at Yahoo with the no email option. I contacted them directly using my private email that I we used before we had a Yahoo group.

Your members set to No Email do not have a clue that your group has moved.

You must contact them to inform them. People with the NO email option set  do not get special notices.

1. Change them to individual email and send out your notice that the group is being transferred. Include the link for yiur new group home page or information about the groups.io website.

2. This is also a test for bouncing. If they bounce you can decide to remove them.  

3. If your group is currently having files copied in the transfer, step 2, the bouncing members will not be copied so you could wait until you are in step 3 or 4 of the transfer. OR you can try to contact them by private email. But they may have the group in allowed senders and your private email might not be in their allowed senders. I would wait for step 3 or 4 then change their email settings. You can change it back after you send the notice ti inform them of the move to Groups.io

As owner, you have a right to disallow the no email setting.


On Friday, October 25, 2019, Juulz <julesmcn@...> wrote:
What I did was send out a Special Notice to my group telling them that the archives have been exported and no new messages will be archived at Yahoo. I warned them to save their "on-topic" posts until the move is complete... I think that should allay their concerns.


moderated Re: Change in group transfer queue sorting algorithm

Duane
 

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:09 AM, Duane wrote:
Unless it's been changed recently, the button should say "Start Group Transfer Process".
Apologies for the bad information.  It does in fact say "Give Go Ahead To Transfer", though there is sometimes a delay before it updates.

Duane


moderated Re: Change in group transfer queue sorting algorithm

Duane
 

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:39 AM, Judy F. wrote:
did the selecting of all of the items I needed transferred, but I didn't see a button saying 'go ahead'
Unless it's been changed recently, the button should say "Start Group Transfer Process".  We can handle this type of question on GMF.

Duane


moderated Re: 2 questions about the Yahoo Group transfer

Juulz
 

What I did was send out a Special Notice to my group telling them that the archives have been exported and no new messages will be archived at Yahoo. I warned them to save their "on-topic" posts until the move is complete... I think that should allay their concerns.


moderated Re: Change in group transfer queue sorting algorithm

Judy F.
 

Mark, I'm the one that had asked about the transfer.io issue.  I got the info this morning that the invite had been accepted  and did the selecting of all of the items I needed transferred, but I didn't see a button saying 'go ahead'. I thought I had remembered seeing that before or reading about it.  Again, I'm not rushing you, but want to make sure I didn't goof up again.  Maybe that's been removed? 

Thank you,
Judy Faulkner
SW Florida - USA
SewWhatEmbroiderySoftware.io


moderated Re: Migrate Groups to Subgroups

 

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:25 AM West Coast Compañeros Staff <westcoastcompaneros@...> wrote:


A couple of days ago I started the process to transfer one of the subgroups (
discussions@companeros.groups.io) and was notified yesterday morning that the transfer agent had accepted the invitation to the corresponding Y!G. I promoted the transfer agent to Moderator in that group and then returned to the "Transfer from Yahoo" page, selected the subgroup from Existing Transfers, and encountered the following message.

We have accepted the invite to your group. Before we can transfer your group, you must upgrade it to the Premium Yearly option. Once you've done that, return here and you will be able to give the go ahead to transfer.

This should be fixed now.

Thanks,
Mark
(normally beta@ is not for bug reports, but as this feature was just discussed here, I approved the message) 


moderated Re: Migrate Groups to Subgroups

West Coast Compañeros Staff
 

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:25 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:18 PM Simon Hedges <simhedges@...> wrote:
Is it possible to create a single master groups, with a subgroup for each of the Yahoogroups, and the ability to migrate to a specified sub-group from each Yahoogroup group?
_._,_._,_
Yes you can do this.
 
Cheers,
Mark 

A few days before the recent pricing change, I created a main group and a few subgroups for my non-profit organization. My understanding was that we could upgrade using the Yearly Premium option and migrate both the main group and the subgroups from Yahoo! Groups for the one yearly fee. I upgraded the main group (announcements@companeros.groups.io) from Premium Monthly to Yearly Premium for $110 the day before the pricing change was announced and initiated the transfer. I am paid up for this month for the Premium Monthly plan, so the payment for Premium Yearly is due to be applied to our credit card next month. Everything seems to be proceeding as expected for the main group transfer. Its current status is "awaiting transfer."

A couple of days ago I started the process to transfer one of the subgroups (
discussions@companeros.groups.io) and was notified yesterday morning that the transfer agent had accepted the invitation to the corresponding Y!G. I promoted the transfer agent to Moderator in that group and then returned to the "Transfer from Yahoo" page, selected the subgroup from Existing Transfers, and encountered the following message.

We have accepted the invite to your group. Before we can transfer your group, you must upgrade it to the Premium Yearly option. Once you've done that, return here and you will be able to give the go ahead to transfer.

When I click on the link for the Premium Yearly option, the Current Plan for the subgroup is listed as Premium Monthly, even though the main group is listed as Premium Yearly. I checked all the other subgroups and they all say the same thing: Current Plan is Premium Monthly. Because of that, I am not able to move forward to give the go ahead for the subgroup transfer. My understanding was that upgrading the main group to Premium Yearly would “trickle down” to all the subgroups. It would be very difficult for my non-profit group to pay $220 to upgrade each of the other subgroups to Premium Yearly. Please advise me if there is a way to correct the status of the subgroup plans to reflect the Premium Yearly status of the main group.

Robert R.


moderated Sub-folders for PHOTO section

RCardona
 

Would it be possible to allow the creation of sub-folders in photo folders, like currently exists for file folders?  I see there have been at least two other requests to provide this feature back in 2018, so am reviving the request.

The dilemma I faced was I could simply add them to the files section, where folder and sub-folder capacity already exists, but then they are unable to be viewed as photos.  To dump them all in the photos section without better organizational sub-folders would create a real mess.   A possible alternative would be to provide a toggle on file folders that would allow the folder to be viewed as a photo folder in the files section. 

R. Cardona


moderated Re: Change in group transfer queue sorting algorithm

RCardona
 

Thank you Mark for being such an attentive and ever evolving mastermind behind the curtain!  I so glad to have found your service and look forward to my new home!  Keep up the great work!!  We appreciate you!


moderated Re: Blank names when users join or get imported translates into postings getting rejected from mail

Janis
 

I would like adding a Display Name when registering be a requirement.  In my family genealogy groups I insist on knowing names and members being on first name basis within the group.  I ask them to close their messages with their name. First name only works for me.

Janis


On Thursday, October 24, 2019, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
Michael,
I’m not interested in promoting my own “intentions.” Features always have some intended use when they are implemented. That’s the reason they are implemented. Often people may find other, “off label” usages for them (so to speak). And that’s fine. I am not “speaking against” anyone or even anyone’s extra usages for this or any other feature. My interest is always in the betterment of the product as a whole.
Take care.
> On Oct 24, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Michael Pavan <michaelpavan@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 24, 2019, at 12:06 PM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 09:02 AM, Michael Pavan wrote:
>> the intention(s) of anyone else
>> No intentions at all here, simply pointing out how the feature currently works.
> The Display Name does currently work as an identifier of who the email belongs to, a sorting reference for the Members list, as well as of who sent a message.
> Try it and see.
>
>> It does take the name from any email sent if there is one,
> Yes, this is the way it currently is automatically populated,
> and yes, as you pointed out you do, Display Names can be done manually.
>> which is generally sufficient for its *intended* purpose (i.e., displaying with the member's sent messages).
> I won't quibble with you that for you it serves your intended purpose.
> I do know from my experience and what others have stated that it also serves the purpose of identifying who the email belongs to and as a sorting reference for the Members list - try it.
>
>> Of course if people have other uses for it that necessitates a change in the feature, why would anyone object. I certainly have no issue.
> Than why speak against them???
>
>>
>> --
>> J
>> Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
> Agreed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu



5301 - 5320 of 27784