For general Groups.io questions, please see the Group Managers Forum and Group_Help groups. Note: those groups are volunteer-led and are not officially run by Groups.io.
moderated
#hashtags
Noticed a while back that after I tagged a post with a subject with no hashtag, with one that is
related, any of the following subject replies didnt tie in to the 1st subject , even with the initial post with same subject tagged.
|
|
moderated
Re: New moderation setting proposal
#suggestion
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 02:32 PM, Ken Schweizer wrote:
we could add an infinite number of new moderation typesI think the recent new types (moderating all topics a person starts and moderating the first message of all topics a person starts) make sense and are useful. I don't see the usefulness of the request here, which is equivalent to putting them on moderation only for replies, not for first messages of any new topics they start. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: New moderation setting proposal
#suggestion
It looks like we could add an infinite number of new moderation types for an infinite number issues, where and when should we just use the basic "Override Moderated"?
"And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." God
From: main@beta.groups.io [mailto:main@beta.groups.io]
On Behalf Of Bruce Bowman
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 12:15 PM To: main@beta.groups.io Subject: [beta] New moderation setting proposal #featurerequest
Some time ago (Ref: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/18455), new moderation settings were established for topics that a "problem subscriber" initiates, to wit: Override: moderate the first message of every topic this person starts Override: moderate all messages of every topic this person starts
|
|
moderated
Re: New moderation setting proposal
#suggestion
Could I ask, is there any reason not to just put such members on moderation?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Aug 28, 2019, at 10:14 AM, Bruce Bowman <bruce.bowman@...> wrote:
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
New moderation setting proposal
#suggestion
Some time ago (Ref: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/18455), new moderation settings were established for topics that a "problem subscriber" initiates, to wit:
Override: moderate the first message of every topic this person starts
Override: moderate all messages of every topic this person starts
I'd really like to be able to set a moderation override for topics that a subscriber replies to. Such a setting would allow me to head off a pernicious problem with subscribers who hijack existing topics when they should be starting a new one. Thanks for your consideration, Bruce
|
|
moderated
Re: Moderator notices
#suggestion
Chris Jones
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 07:25 AM, Shal Farley wrote:
If you are a mod or owner the From address is a drop-list: select the group's +owner address.This may not provide the required functionality; see my #16576 of April 2018. If the requirement is for any given message (or reply for that matter) to be unambiguously from a Group Owner or Moderator then using the existing drop down is not wholly effective; the message still has the originator's personal Display Name included. I just wish my original request had achieved greater traction. Chris
|
|
moderated
Re: Moderator notices
#suggestion
Glenn,
Need a way to send the group announcements from the owner, moderatorClick New Topic. If you are a mod or owner the From address is a drop-list: select the group's +owner address. Shal https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum
|
|
moderated
Re: Moderator notices
#suggestion
I agree. I've hacked this by creating an account called [MyGroupName]Moderators and making it an owner. But it's a PITA.
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Moderator notices
#suggestion
Glenn Hobbs, Catnap, 3400 PCI00395L393
Need a way to send the group announcements from the owner, moderator of a group.
|
|
moderated
Re: option to set maximum attendees for calendar events
Even with the first group event we held, we experienced people who cancelled literally in the 11th hour, a couple of whom strongly requested a change of time and venue to accommodate them. I want these people waitlisted the next time they RSVP as coming to an event, and would really like to be able to do that. Without it, we're stuck letting them hold places in the next events (which are limited to small numbers of attendees) while they make up their minds. We have similar problems, we have people either cancel at the last minute or just not even show up. We need to be able to waitlist or remove repeat offenders as many of our events our limited by the venue we are visiting. It also makes our group look bad when only half the people show up. This could be resolved if I could have moved people off the waitlist who were waiting for someone to cancel, but never do. It's very frustrating!
|
|
moderated
Re: option to set maximum attendees for calendar events
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:58 PM, Nancy Funk wrote:
I agree that this would be a very useful and important addition. Even with the first group event we held, we experienced people who cancelled literally in the 11th hour, a couple of whom strongly requested a change of time and venue to accommodate them. I want these people waitlisted the next time they RSVP as coming to an event, and would really like to be able to do that. Without it, we're stuck letting them hold places in the next events (which are limited to small numbers of attendees) while they make up their minds. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: option to set maximum attendees for calendar events
Does the word "yet" mean this might be coming down the pike? That would be awesome if it is! :)
|
|
moderated
Re: #featurerequest
#suggestion
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 03:57 PM, Glenn Hobbs, Catnap, 3400 PCI00395L393 wrote:
Ability to search files. Awesome if included filename and content.That's already available on the Files page. I know it includes content in PDF files, but not sure about others. Duane
|
|
moderated
#featurerequest
#suggestion
Glenn Hobbs, Catnap, 3400 PCI00395L393
Ability to search files. Awesome if included filename and content.
|
|
moderated
Re: option to set maximum attendees for calendar events
I'll go the opposite direction: would it be possible to specify a minimum number of attendees by a certain date or the event is automatically cancelled? Probably pie-in-the-sky.
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: option to set maximum attendees for calendar events
Mark,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
You just added all that in the last 10 minutes and are messing with me again, right? 😊 Thanks!
On Aug 26, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: option to set maximum attendees for calendar events
Unless you're talking about something else, you can specify the max number of attendees for an event and you can specify whether people can bring guests. If too many want to go, the overflow are put on a waitlist, which is automatically managed. What isn't available yet is the ability for the organizer to take people off the list manually. Mark
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:07 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote: It would be convenient to set a maximum number of attendees before locking the event. (It would be especially helpful currently, when there are no notifications to the event organizer that someone has RSVP'd, making it difficult to lock events by hand in a timely manner.)
|
|
moderated
Re: option to set maximum attendees for calendar events
ps You could possibly add a waitlist capability to that if and when implemented.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Aug 26, 2019, at 12:06 PM, J_Catlady via Groups.Io <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
option to set maximum attendees for calendar events
It would be convenient to set a maximum number of attendees before locking the event. (It would be especially helpful currently, when there are no notifications to the event organizer that someone has RSVP'd, making it difficult to lock events by hand in a timely manner.)
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: option to send calendar event reminder or resend
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:17 AM, J_Catlady wrote:
the bare minimum would be a simple reminder feature.It seems Mark's plan to make me question my reality is in full gear. Just found the "Add reminder" feature. :) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|