Date   

moderated Re: Comments below photos

Benoît Dumeaux
 

To my opinion, comment below photo must open of linked to a topic to messages.
Maybe give to option to user to show his message of the topic to the photo comments.


moderated Re: Hide French quote

Duane
 

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 02:40 AM, Benoît Dumeaux wrote:
Is this function retroactive to old messages?
I just checked on one of my groups where this was happening for messages from one individual, and it IS retroactive!

Duane


moderated Hide Italian 🇮🇹 quotes

Benoît Dumeaux
 

Example:
El lun., 4 de marzo de 2019 19:44, Sean O'Sullivan <seanosullivanemail@...> escribió:
Like
El [lun. ; mar. ; mer. ; gio. ; ven. ; sab. ; dom. OR lunedì ; martedì ; mercoledì ; giovedì ; venerdì ; sabato ; domenica] , [1-31] de [gennaio ; febbraio ; marzo ; aprile ; maggio ; giugno ; luglio ; agosto ; settembre ; ottobre ; novembre ; dicembre ] de [year hours], [name <e-mail>] escribió:

^^


moderated Re: Hide French quote

Benoît Dumeaux
 

Excellent
Is this function retroactive to old messages?


moderated Re: EarthLink

Sharon Villines
 

SUBJECT LINE, SUBJECT LINE, SUBJECT LINE. PLEASE.

On Mar 6, 2019, at 9:38 PM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:

I can see a teensy-weensy point to it, but not enough to overcome the fact that the functionality basically already exists. Suppose you want to have a look at all your earthlink members (god help you if you have a lot of them..) and see how many of them are bouncing vs. how many are not. You would do the sort on email address from the overall members list that Chris suggests, just to get a feel for your statistic. But then, if you want to send bounce probes to all of them, you have to go into the Bouncing Members page to do it, rather than doing it right from your Members list.

If you go to Bouncing Members first, of course you do get all the bouncing members at one go, including the earthlink ones. But you don't see how many of the earthlink members are NOT bouncing. FWIW. It's not a whole lot of extra functionality. But it is a teeny weeny bit.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: EarthLink

 

I can see a teensy-weensy point to it, but not enough to overcome the fact that the functionality basically already exists. Suppose you want to have a look at all your earthlink members (god help you if you have a lot of them..) and see how many of them are bouncing vs. how many are not. You would do the sort on email address from the overall members list that Chris suggests, just to get a feel for your statistic. But then, if you want to send bounce probes to all of them, you have to go into the Bouncing Members page to do it, rather than doing it right from your Members list.

If you go to Bouncing Members first, of course you do get all the bouncing members at one go, including the earthlink ones. But you don't see how many of the earthlink members are NOT bouncing. FWIW. It's not a whole lot of extra functionality. But it is a teeny weeny bit.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: EarthLink

Jim Higgins
 

Received from Bruce Bowman at 3/6/2019 02:51 PM UTC:

Making the available Actions based on what checkboxes you check is doable, but more complicated, and perhaps not very intuitive. Please consider the situation where you accidentally select one person who *isn't* in a Bouncing condition and end up struggling to understand why "Send Bounce Probe" isn't showing up. I find the condition of the pull-down menu easier to wrap my head around than trying to sort through a litany of status badges.

The suggestion to sort on "bouncing status" is pointless to begin with. If you view bouncing members - an already available option that works quite well - you have a list of everyone who is bouncing and the "Send bounce probe" option is available whether you select one or all from that list. Nothing new is needed.

Jim H


moderated Re: Hide French quote

 

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 11:58 PM Benoît Dumeaux <benoit.dumeaux@...> wrote:
Hide French quote archive
When you see:
Le [lundi ; mardi ; mercredi ; jeudi ; vendredi ; samedi ; dimanche] [1-31] [janvier, février, mars, avril, mai, juin, juillet, août, septembre, novembre, décembre] [1980-2019+] à [hour], [author <e-mail>] a écrit :
I've added this.

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Re: Internet explorer 11?

Ken Schweizer
 

Hi Mark,

 

I'm using Windowz 10 ver 1809 updated 3/4/19 and IE 11.348.17763 and have not had an issue. I just replied to double check and I didn't have an issue.

 

Ken

 

“You do what you can for as long as you can, and when you finally can’t, you do the next best thing. You back up but you don’t give up.” ―Chuck Yeager

 

From: main@beta.groups.io [mailto:main@beta.groups.io] On Behalf Of Mark Fletcher
Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 11:52 AM
To: beta@groups.io
Subject: [beta] Internet explorer 11?

 

Hi All,

 

Is anyone using Windows 10 with Internet Explorer 11? I've a report of someone not being able to reply to messages via the website with that combo.

 

Thanks,

Mark


moderated Re: Internet explorer 11?

 

Thanks all!

Mark


moderated Re: Internet explorer 11?

Brian Vogel <britechguy@...>
 

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 02:12 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
It's not showing up! (KIDDING;)
What a card!  ;-)   [Coming to you from Google Chrome Browser this time - my usual for this site]
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1809, Build 17763 

     I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.

           ~ Jay Gould, U.S. financier & railroad robber baron (1836 - 1892)


moderated Re: Internet explorer 11?

 

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:05 AM, Brian Vogel wrote:
if this message shows up
It's not showing up! (KIDDING;)
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Internet explorer 11?

Brian Vogel <britechguy@...>
 

I'm currently logged in using IE11, so if this message shows up after I hit the Reply to Group button then that means the web interface is working from IE11 here.

--

Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1809, Build 17763 

     I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.

           ~ Jay Gould, U.S. financier & railroad robber baron (1836 - 1892)


moderated Re: Internet explorer 11?

Dave Wade
 

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 05:52 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:


Hi All,

Is anyone using Windows 10 with Internet Explorer 11? I've a report of someone
not being able to reply to messages via the website with that combo.

Thanks,
Mark
Not usually, but its installed so I thought I would try....
…. can't see any issues...


moderated Re: EarthLink

Sharon Villines
 

Can you fix the subject line. I keep opening these messages to see if there is anything new about Earthlink.

Thanks,
Sharon

On Mar 6, 2019, at 10:05 AM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:

Totally agree with Bruce. It was a nice thought, but the only solutions to make it really work seem too convoluted.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Internet explorer 11?

 

Hi All,

Is anyone using Windows 10 with Internet Explorer 11? I've a report of someone not being able to reply to messages via the website with that combo.

Thanks,
Mark


moderated Re: EarthLink

 

Totally agree with Bruce. It was a nice thought, but the only solutions to make it really work seem too convoluted.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: EarthLink

Bruce Bowman
 

Making the available Actions based on what checkboxes you check is doable, but more complicated, and perhaps not very intuitive. Please consider the situation where you accidentally select one person who *isn't* in a Bouncing condition and end up struggling to understand why "Send Bounce Probe" isn't showing up. I find the condition of the pull-down menu easier to wrap my head around than trying to sort through a litany of status badges.

Regards,
Bruce


moderated Re: EarthLink

 

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 06:16 AM, J_Catlady wrote:
grayed out
Or "disabled," as Mark likes to call it - putting a little "x" on the button when you try to click on it, and making it clear that it is non-functional.
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: EarthLink

 

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 06:14 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
Such flags as are appended to any given member in the "full" list are carried over into any filtered list.
Yes, totally, the flags are there. But you would still be able to select non-bouncing as well as bouncing members from your search results. So the "send bounce probe" action would have to be grayed out if you do that. It does seem doable, but it *would* have to be done to prevent users from sending bounce probes to non-bouncing members.
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

12481 - 12500 of 32460