Date   

moderated Re: Virus scanning

Chris Jones
 

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:25 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
My default implementation would be to turn it on so that it blocks all emails, files and photos that it finds has a virus or phishing attempt.
Mark; this thread has been referenced on GMF following someone reporting that a group member (actual group not reported) had had their email spoofed and a zipped attachment sent to the group.

Does your virus scanning detect problems in a zipped attachment?

Chris


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 06:15 AM, Bruce Bowman wrote:
Maybe they don't currently match?
They don't
Right. It was more or less a rhetorical question. :-)
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

Bruce Bowman
 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:09 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
Maybe they don't currently match?
They don't.

Here is a screenshot if I click the unsub link in a message footer:



Here's what I get if I click the unsub link online (on the Subscription page):



I get exactly the same screens regardless of whether "no email" is disabled in group Settings.

Hope this helps,
Bruce


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

Mark, I didn't test message footers. From the web, you get only the option for Special Notices. Maybe they don't currently match?
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:52 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
???? Mark, I just re-tested this and was only given the option of Special Notice. But it's no biggie!

Well I'm confused. This is the page you go to if you click the Unsubscribe button in message footers? It has /leave/ and /xyzzy in the URL?

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

???? Mark, I just re-tested this and was only given the option of Special Notice. But it's no biggie!


On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:48 PM Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:29 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
Ok, I finally tested this out in my test group (something I failed to do in the first place), and I have one correction to some of the statements made here about the feature: people unsubscribing get the option to stay but change to Special Notice, but they aren't given the option of changing to digest or any of the other delivery methods. 

Hmm, yep, I misspoke. They are given the option of daily summary or special notices.

Thanks,
Mark 


--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:29 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
Ok, I finally tested this out in my test group (something I failed to do in the first place), and I have one correction to some of the statements made here about the feature: people unsubscribing get the option to stay but change to Special Notice, but they aren't given the option of changing to digest or any of the other delivery methods. 

Hmm, yep, I misspoke. They are given the option of daily summary or special notices.

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice�� option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

Of course they can. But statements have been made here to the effect that they're given the choice of other options at the time of the unsub, which is not, strictly speaking, correct. :-) Although no big deal. 


On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:49 PM Leeni <leeniluvsgroups@...> wrote:
Okay now once they click to stay in the group, they can go to their profile and change their settings to one of the Digests or any other delivery method they choose. Leeni
 
 
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: J_Catlady
Date: 2/20/2019 8:29:03 PM
Subject: Re: [beta] Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion
 
Ok, I finally tested this out in my test group (something I failed to do in the first place), and I have one correction to some of the statements made here about the feature: people unsubscribing get the option to stay but change to Special Notice, but they aren't given the option of changing to digest or any of the other delivery methods. 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

 


--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice�� option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

Leeni
 

Okay now once they click to stay in the group, they can go to their profile and change their settings to one of the Digests or any other delivery method they choose. Leeni
 
 
 
 

-------Original Message-------
 
From: J_Catlady
Date: 2/20/2019 8:29:03 PM
Subject: Re: [beta] Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion
 
Ok, I finally tested this out in my test group (something I failed to do in the first place), and I have one correction to some of the statements made here about the feature: people unsubscribing get the option to stay but change to Special Notice, but they aren't given the option of changing to digest or any of the other delivery methods. 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

 


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

Ok, I finally tested this out in my test group (something I failed to do in the first place), and I have one correction to some of the statements made here about the feature: people unsubscribing get the option to stay but change to Special Notice, but they aren't given the option of changing to digest or any of the other delivery methods. 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

Thanks, Mark, Leeni, and Duane. It seems my group member was reporting incorrectly about not getting the option.


On Feb 20, 2019, at 5:19 PM, Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:10 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
Members unsubscribing from our group due to “too many emails” seem not to be given other subscription options. It seems that in groups where no-email is not disabled, they are presented with an option to stay in the group but go to no-email. If no-email is disabled, I think they should be presented with staying in the group with special notice.

As Leeni mentioned downthread, people do indeed get the option to switch to digest or special notices only. They get that when clicking the 'Unsubscribe' link in emails. That has nothing to do with whether no email is disabled or not.  

Thanks,
Mark

--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:10 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
Members unsubscribing from our group due to “too many emails” seem not to be given other subscription options. It seems that in groups where no-email is not disabled, they are presented with an option to stay in the group but go to no-email. If no-email is disabled, I think they should be presented with staying in the group with special notice.

As Leeni mentioned downthread, people do indeed get the option to switch to digest or special notices only. They get that when clicking the 'Unsubscribe' link in emails. That has nothing to do with whether no email is disabled or not.  

Thanks,
Mark


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

Duane, are you saying that in the no-email-disabled groups, your members receive the option, mid-stream of unsubscribing, of cancelling their unsub and instead switching to s different email delivery? Because that’s what happens in the NON-no-email-disables groups. Just trying to figure out whether my unsubscribing member was reporting incorrectly about not having been presented with the option. 

To be clear: yes, I know that all members have the option to change their delivery preference at any time. I am explicitly discussing thd feature wherein the system stops their unsub temporarily and explicitly GIVES them the option, at that time and by clicking on the link, to stay in the group and change their preference.


On Feb 20, 2019, at 5:10 PM, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote:

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:37 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
All my members have all the available options included.
Does your group have no-email disabled?
Yes, it's disabled on 3 of my groups, but the users can still choose any of the others.

Duane

--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

Duane
 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:37 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
All my members have all the available options included.
Does your group have no-email disabled?
Yes, it's disabled on 3 of my groups, but the users can still choose any of the others.

Duane


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

Brian, there are too many double negatives here. Bottom line, now that I understand your preference I totally agree with you. Special notices should always get through. The fact that no-email subscriptions block them is the reason that I and others fought so hard for an option to disable no-email. We are totally on the same page, except that I personally don’t care that no-email blocks special notices nod that there’s a feature to get past that.


On Feb 20, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Brian Vogel <britechguy@...> wrote:

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:37 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
It does. No revisiting required.
What requires revisiting is whether it should.  I don't need any further convincing that it does.  I have never been persuaded by the argument, "because we've always done it that way," and particularly once it becomes apparent that the law of unintended consequences is hugely at play.  It is, and shall remain, my opinion that a no email choice should not apply to special notices.

I will now happily return you to your previous topic and offer no more on this side loop.
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1809, Build 17763 

     I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.

           ~ Jay Gould, U.S. financier & railroad robber baron (1836 - 1892)


--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

Brian Vogel <britechguy@...>
 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:37 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
It does. No revisiting required.
What requires revisiting is whether it should.  I don't need any further convincing that it does.  I have never been persuaded by the argument, "because we've always done it that way," and particularly once it becomes apparent that the law of unintended consequences is hugely at play.  It is, and shall remain, my opinion that a no email choice should not apply to special notices.

I will now happily return you to your previous topic and offer no more on this side loop.
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1809, Build 17763 

     I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.

           ~ Jay Gould, U.S. financier & railroad robber baron (1836 - 1892)


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:34 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:
the idea that an end-user's choice of no-email should block administrative notices
It does. No revisiting required. I misread your message. Can we get back to the original topic now? :-)
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

Brian Vogel <britechguy@...>
 

Well, based on what has been stated here, which I have no reason to doubt, the idea that an end-user's choice of no-email should block administrative notices is in desperate need of revisiting.

I can see the very rare desire to receive nothing except special notices.  I can never see a justification for a member (and I mean any member - owner, moderator, or regular) to be able to block special notices.

I also fully expect that group owners and moderators know better than to abuse the special notice feature.

--

Brian - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1809, Build 17763 

     I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.

           ~ Jay Gould, U.S. financier & railroad robber baron (1836 - 1892)


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

Brian Vogel writes:
"OK, but I still don't understand. My understanding is that it is not possible for members of a group to block special notices by e-mail under any circumstances, even if they're "no e-mail." Am I mistaken?"

It appears you may be mistaken, Brian. "No email" means exactly that; no Special Notices or any other messages.

That's why the option to have Special Notices only. We had groups moving and making other changes and realized that a number of members were being lost or otherwise missing important information because there was no way to contact them as they were set to 'No email'.

Dano


moderated Re: Give unsubscribing members ‘special notice’ option if no-email is disabled #suggestion

 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:03 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:
My understanding is that it is not possible for members of a group to block special notices by e-mail under any circumstances, even if they're "no e-mail."   Am I mistaken?
Brian - Yes, re-reading this I do see that there IS a misunderstanding here. If a member is no-email, then they don't even receive special notices. Disabling the no-email option makes it so that they do receive at least special notices.
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

9121 - 9140 of 28898