For general Groups.io questions, please see the Group Managers Forum and Group_Help groups. Note: those groups are volunteer-led and are not officially run by Groups.io.
moderated
Re: Google Drive Integration
Hi Ricky, On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Ricky-KF5WVJ via Groups.Io <slikriktn1@...> wrote:
The attachments should be uploaded immediately when the message is sent. There were errors (from Google) when you recently tested it, and I've been trying to track them down, but unfortunately haven't had any luck so far. Off list, can you give me some more information: when did the integration last work for you? Did you make any changes to your Google account since then? You should be able to fix it by logging out of the Google drive integration and then set it up again. But I need to find out why the integration 'went bad'. Thanks, Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: moderator permissions for seeing +owner messages?
ro-esp
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:06 pm, Green Fizzpops wrote:
I searched for this but couldn't find anything relating.As far as I know, anyone you appoint "moderator" will receive the groupname+owner@groups.io messages, even if you don't give them ANY "moderator privileges". I know for sure that's how it works in yahoogroups, and I don't remember any discussion about it being different in groups.io groetjes, Ronaldo
|
|
moderated
Google Drive Integration
How often does the groups.io upload attachments to google drive? the reason i ask is,when i first set it up and posted a topic with an attachment and it up loaded immediately to google drive, since then i have posted a couple more topics with attachments and they still have not been uploaded to google drive. this happened the other day when i was testing google drive integration for our group. thanks, ricky kf5wvj
|
|
moderated
Re: Calendars
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Ricky-KF5WVJ via Groups.Io <slikriktn1@...> wrote:
The newer versions of the calendar code that we use now has a month list view. I was able to upgrade and add that view pretty quickly. Cheers, Mark
|
|
moderated
moderator permissions for seeing +owner messages?
Hi I searched for this but couldn't find anything relating. I have a group with a pending membership questionairre setup. Which (combination) of the moderator permissions gives a moderator the ability to see the +owner messages a pending member has sent so they can see the replies to the questionairre on the website? I tried: -Approve Pending Members -Set Member Subscription Options (also allows access to the member list) And also set them to receive all owner emails but that didn't allow them to see the +owner messages "tab" on the member's page. Thanks Green
|
|
moderated
Re: what does 'confirmation' accomplish?
Thanks, Mark. :)
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: what does 'confirmation' accomplish?
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:38 AM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
That is correct. The only time someone will get a confirmation email *after* they've already confirmed their account is if they change their email address. When you change your email address, we put you back into the not confirmed state and send you a new confirmation email. Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: Font Size on Digest
I am checking with our members now to see if anyone else has noticed the problem. If further follow-up is needed, I'll take the discussion over to GMF.
Thanks,
Jean
#OrlandoStrong
|
|
moderated
Re: what does 'confirmation' accomplish?
Shal,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That answers part of my question. I was actually talking about a situation where someone not logged in goes to the site, tries to join a group, and when asked for an email address, enters the address of a current groups.io member other than themselves (I.e., someone who is already confirmed in general). So in that case the system asks them to log in and they are prevented from joining if they are not that person and so can't log in as them. Good. But the other part of my question remains the same. Suppose someone already a groups.io member (I.e., with a groups.io account, I.e., already belongs to at least one group) tries to join a second group, I believe that no confirmation email is sent in that case. Correct? J Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:48 AM, Shal Farley <shals2nd@gmail.com> wrote: --
J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: what does 'confirmation' accomplish?
J,
If someone is confirmed, then anyone else can go to the groups.ioNot unless they are logged in as that person. Which they can only achieve by having that person's password or by receiving an Email link to log in, sent to that person's email address. Shal
|
|
moderated
Re: what does 'confirmation' accomplish?
In other words: "confirmed" is a function of groups.io membership, not of membership in a particular group. If someone is confirmed, then anyone else can go to the groups.io site and enroll them in any other group, without being that person. I assume that the only check on this is the subscription email the person will then receive, with instructions to unsubscribe if they did not request the membership. Is that correct? Or do you sent out another confirmation email for that situation? Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: what does 'confirmation' accomplish?
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:53 pm, Mark Fletcher wrote:
if you're not confirmed, the NC shows up for all your subscriptions. Mark, Please humor me for a moment. ;) Yes, I understand the above. "NC" appears for all subscriptions if the member has not confirmed. But conversely, if they HAVE confirmed, just once, just for the first group they apply to, then NC appears for NO successive groups they apply for. "Confirmed or not confirmed" is a variable dependent on an email's membership in "at least one groups.io group," not in a particular groups.io group. (I can see this, for example, by banning a particular email address. If that email address happens to be a member of just one groups.io group, not even ours, then no "NC" appears after their name in the "banned members" list, even though they are not a member of OUR group; and conversely. Banning an email address is, I discovered by chance, a way to find out if a particular email address is yet participating in groups.io at all.) That's the basis of my question. If I understand correctly, "NC" just means that the member has clicked on their confirmation email for the FIRST group they have applied to join. If they already belong to any other group besides mine, and they then apply to join mine, then if I understand correctly, and based on seeing what I see when I ban a particular email address, no "NC" appears after their name. And that, I have always understood (and as you say here), means that once I approve their membership, they have access to my group immediately. They don't need to "re-confirm." So I still ask: if a confirmation email still sent to a pending in this case - the case that they are already have a confirmed groups.io account (in the sense that they already have a subscription to at least one other group)? I understand completely that a pending member does not have access to my group's content, even after approval, if they have not confirmed. (That has been a source of headache for me, as you know from the couple of times you've done me the favor of confirming already-approved members who could not for the life of them find their confirmation emails.;) That is not what I'm asking about. My problem is that it seems to me that once an email address has confirmed their "groups.io membership" (which I use to mean "is a member of at least one groups.io group"), someone ELSE can go to the groups.io website and apply to join any OTHER group using the same email address, assuming that no "confirmation" email is sent for every subsequent group someone joins or applies to, once they belong to at least one. On the other hand, if subsequent confirmations ARE sent for each group, then my question is, what does this change internally? It does not change whether or not "NC" appears by their name. Because once they're confirmed for ONE group, they are confirmed, period. (Again, my "proof" is what I see when I ban any email address that happens to belong some other group besides mine.) I hope I am making my question more clear this time. Bottom line: If an email address already has a groups.io account (i.e., already belongs to at least one group), then is a new confirmation email sent out when they apply to join another group? If so, why (internally speaking), since the NC is already gone from their email address in general? -- Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: what does 'confirmation' accomplish?
J, On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:09 AM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote: I've noticed that 'NC' appears next to a pending member only if the pending member is not already a member of groups.io at all. If they are already in some other group besides the one they have (presumably) applied to join, there will be no NC next to their name, so it will look as if they have confirmed for *this* group. Whether someone is confirmed or not has no relation to how many groups they are subscribed to. And if you're not confirmed, the NC shows up for all your subscriptions.
That's the whole point of the confirmation process, to prevent people from adding others to groups. (Remember, if you're not confirmed, you can be subscribed but you have no access to the group and don't get messages). Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: Font Size on Digest
Donald Hellen
Brian,
I believe it could be taken to GMF if the need arises. Donald On Tue, 07 Mar 2017 08:04:15 -0800, "Brian Vogel" <britechguy@gmail.com> wrote: If this is considered inappropriate or "off topic" for beta I will be happy to take it private, but I presume at some point there will be someone else who encounters the same issue and perhaps for the same reason, so I'll try to help here unless directed otherwise.-- Brian
|
|
moderated
Re: Font Size on Digest
Brian Vogel <britechguy@...>
Jean, How are you reading your digests? By this I mean are you using a webmail service through a browser or an e-mail client? (It sounds like an e-mail client program, but knowing which one would be helpful). The fact that you are seeing this in messages coming in from two different e-mail addresses suggests to me that it's something "on your end" but it will probably take some back and forth to figure out what. If this is considered inappropriate or "off topic" for beta I will be happy to take it private, but I presume at some point there will be someone else who encounters the same issue and perhaps for the same reason, so I'll try to help here unless directed otherwise. To think is to differ. ~ Clarence Darrow
|
|
moderated
Re: Font Size on Digest
Maria
I am not seeing anything different. I've checked on desktop (safari) / desktop (firefox) / mobile IOS mail + gmail and Y! app (Y! and Gmail accounts) and it all looks same as it has for several months. I checked digests from several groups. I wonder what else it could be? Maria
|
|
moderated
Re: Font Size on Digest
Hi Jean, On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Jean Bennett via Groups.Io <jcbennett@...> wrote:
I'm not aware of any changes recently that would affect font sizes in the digests. Are others in your groups seeing the same thing? Perhaps it was a single message that screwed things up? Thanks, Mark
|
|
moderated
Font Size on Digest
I may have missed this somewhere, but did the font size recently get changed on the digest? I am receiving the digest from three groups - one in Yahoo mail and two on AOL. The fonts on all are now so tiny as to be almost unreadable. I am reading on desktop and have made no changes to how my e-mail is displayed. It was not this tiny previously - and I would appreciate it if the font could be return to the previous size. Jean
|
|
moderated
Re: photos on home page
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:22 pm, J_Catlady wrote:
That's the one I'd like to be able to turn off, if it's implemented (as well as on files which is now there.) Or be able to remove/delete the notification if all files/photos/etc are moderated. (If the "notify" is an option for the user, I'd want it off by default, but would prefer that I could disable it completely.) I'm only referring to uploaded items, not attached (which is turned off in most of my groups.) Duane
|
|
moderated
Re: photos on home page
p.s. It also makes me wonder, if photos are moderated, what will happen when duplicate photos come in via email replies. You would not want to force the same photo to be approved 10 times in a row. Or are we just talking about uploaded, rather than emailed photos?
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|