For general Groups.io questions, please see the Group Managers Forum and Group_Help groups. Note: those groups are volunteer-led and are not officially run by Groups.io.
moderated
GFetting plenty of strange text & characters in messages today
Donald Hellen
Here's a sample of what I'm seeing in my email reader.
Before the body text, I see things like this (this is pasted from a single message): --part1_2806c9.1ae3bf7a.45c8c81e_boundary Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="part1_2806c9.1ae3bf7a.45c8c81e_rel_boundary" --part1_2806c9.1ae3bf7a.45c8c81e_rel_boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2806c9.1ae3bf7a_alt_bound" --2806c9.1ae3bf7a_alt_bound Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there a setting I need to get to in order to strip this from incoming messages? Donald
|
|
Very impressive. Just imagine, if you will, yahoo creating a report like this for every outage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzlG28B-R8Y -- Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
It seems that Karl is a trouble maker and a bully. Thanks for dealing with him!
Ro
From: beta@groups.io <beta@groups.io> on behalf of Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io>
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 7:26 AM To: beta@groups.io Subject: [beta] Reduced email delivery overnight #outage Outage SummaryEmail delivery was dramatically slowed overnight due to a crashing bug in the karl process. I fixed the bug around 6:25am pacific time, and it took about 25 minutes for all queued email to be delivered. DurationFrom approximately around midnight pacific time until 6:25am pacific time. CauseA group was transferred from Yahoo yesterday with a lot of users from a bogus/typo domain, yahooo.com. That domain has an MX record that is blank. We were not ignoring blank MX records. What that meant is that for email to those users, we'd connect to the localhost SMTP port to send this email, essentially DOSing ourselves. I was alerted to this behavior on Friday evening via our normal alerts. I wrote a fix and pushed it to the site. Because of how we retry sending messages, the code introduced with the fix was not run until after I went to bed. I did not consider the fix to be risky, but the fix contained a divide by zero, causing a crash. The karl process then continued to crash until I woke up and saw the problem. I was not alerted to the crashes. Areas Of Improvement
Thanks, Mark
|
|
Outage SummaryEmail delivery was dramatically slowed overnight due to a crashing bug in the karl process. I fixed the bug around 6:25am pacific time, and it took about 25 minutes for all queued email to be delivered. DurationFrom approximately around midnight pacific time until 6:25am pacific time. CauseA group was transferred from Yahoo yesterday with a lot of users from a bogus/typo domain, yahooo.com. That domain has an MX record that is blank. We were not ignoring blank MX records. What that meant is that for email to those users, we'd connect to the localhost SMTP port to send this email, essentially DOSing ourselves. I was alerted to this behavior on Friday evening via our normal alerts. I wrote a fix and pushed it to the site. Because of how we retry sending messages, the code introduced with the fix was not run until after I went to bed. I did not consider the fix to be risky, but the fix contained a divide by zero, causing a crash. The karl process then continued to crash until I woke up and saw the problem. I was not alerted to the crashes. Areas Of Improvement
Thanks, Mark
|
|
moderated
Site updates
#changelog
Changes to the site this week:
Have a good weekend everybody. Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: Daily Summary Email
Maria, I like this whole thing. People who subscribe to digest currently use it (at least in many cases) just to get an idea of what's happening, and then they reply on the site. So this would work for them. Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: Daily Summary Email
Maria
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 01:02 pm, J_Catlady wrote:
Absolutely! My understanding was that this was going to be a new subscription option. They would choose *either* the summary *or* the digest. Is that a misunderstanding? Yes, that's what i meant. Another option not an additional email on top of digests. So you pick: special notice, digest, or daily summary, or individual posts. I think it might be nice if it started with a summary like: Your group has N new topics Your group has N new replies Then the index of topics - and I love the idea of including the number icon to indicate how many posts exist in that topic and the graphic for the hashtag assigned to the topic. And would be cool if the hashtag were clickable to bring people to the page with other posts with that hashtag. Then graphic links to : "Post a New Topic" "Vist Your Group" "Go to Your Account Settings" (just ideas...) If it's a daily summary - i think it's OK to NOT have the actual posts in there but rather just have it all link one by one via the index to the individual posts/topics on the web interface. Again - the issue with truncation in the gmail app is so annoying because those who get emails there think it's the service's fault when an email is truncated ( with no link to load rest). I guess it's hard for people to imagine that Gmail's app could be so silly as to do that...So on that account I'd vote to avoid anything that results in clipping. Also - another reason to not include the whole posts in a daily summary of activity email is because of attachments. On groups where there is an image or 10 on each post, that summary email could be loaded with images and each IOS mail client kinda handles those differently - some well and some not so good. I think a summary of activity that is easy to skim gives you an idea of what's going on and the opportunity to engage via web. It also helps people not "forget" about the group - something you don't get when you are on special notice only. Re: snippet: It's tricky... I think the first sentence with an ellipsis to indicate there is more, could be useful to give a feeling that you are skimming, but you'd probably have to show the most recent post in that topic for the snippet, otherwise people will see same snippet each day for as long as that topics is active. Maria
|
|
moderated
Re: Daily Summary Email
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:58 am, Frances wrote:
If someone is overwhelmed with email (even by digests), won’t another email be annoying? If someone is getting 10 or more digests a day, that one summary email may be long. Absolutely! My understanding was that this was going to be a new subscription option. They would choose *either* the summary *or* the digest. Is that a misunderstanding? Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: Daily Summary Email
Mark,
I like Maria's idea of a daily summary email. What should it contain?I like Frances' example (#12836), which looks a lot like the Topics View absent message snippets. https://groups.io/g/beta/message/12836 If a snippet were included that would open again Brian's question about whether it should be from the most recent message rather than the topic starter. Or the oldest message covered by this summary. Should it just contain a list of subjects of messages that were sentThat might be best, as being the least likely to get snipped by a receiving mail interface. Also, when should it be sent? I'm thinking perhaps morning time."Morning time" where? The subscriber's time zone? That would probably work for most people. Or have it be a subscription parameter. And of course, is this summary subject to the advanced subscription options? I'd say yes it should be, for the same reasons the Digest is. -- Shal https://groups.io/g/Group_Help https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum
|
|
moderated
Re: Daily Summary Email
Steph Mathews <smathews@...>
I think that it should contain links to all of
the topics from that day and the replies within that topic.
Steph
On 2/2/2017 1:43 PM, Mark Fletcher
wrote:
|
|
moderated
Re: Daily Summary Email
Hi again,
If someone is overwhelmed with email (even by digests), won’t another email be annoying? If someone is getting 10 or more digests a day, that one summary email may be long. For less active groups, it might be a useful tool though and encourage participation. Frances
|
|
moderated
Re: Digests tweak
Hi All, For now, I've changed it so that a digest will not be forced at 10pm pacific time if a digest has been sent out within the previous 6 hours. We'll see how that goes; I can always tweak it. Thanks, Mark
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote: Mark,
|
|
moderated
Re: Daily Summary Email
Hi everyone,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Would it be possible to contain the number of messages for each subject? It might be interesting but ?not necessary? for the tags to be shown: But things that do show should be clickable in the email. Morning would be useful. Frances
|
|
moderated
Daily Summary Email
Hi All, I like Maria's idea of a daily summary email. What should it contain? If it was just like a digest, it'd be way too long. Should it just contain a list of subjects of messages that were sent over the previous 24 hours? Also, when should it be sent? I'm thinking perhaps morning time. Thanks, Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: Digests tweak
That was a typo. She received 12 digests, not 11. Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2017, at 11:35 AM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: Digests tweak
In the group in question, the traffic has always been several hundred messages per day. The person who complained is a very experienced group member and practically (although I believe, unofficially) runs the group in question. Yesterday she literally received 11 digests from the IBD group. This is almost causing her to go no-email. Those sound like good suggestions. J Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2017, at 10:38 AM, HR Tech via Groups.Io <m.conway11@...> wrote:
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: Digests tweak
Hi
Perhaps more info to subscribers about alternative ways to subscribe? There is a link in the footer to Change Your Subscription. If you get every post as a separate email, we get follow / unfollow. Not sure about digest. Perhaps links or help there would be good? Or clearer? Frances
|
|
moderated
Re: Digests tweak
Maria
In busy groups what I am seeing is: the increase in digests has helped increase activity. So that's a good thing. But yes, perhaps there are those who are wondering why they are getting 2x the amount of digests, but still may prefer the fact that finally they work well - lets remember that not only were they clipped - they were truncated with no link in gmail app PLUS the reply to links didn't work properly in the expanded version - so big issues. But I did receive one feedback from a person who felt the frequency of digests was too much (even though it's exactly the way it was on Y! now) - this was a newbie so the prior user "training" didn't apply, and I suspect that even the 1 digest every 25 messages would have felt like too much for that person as they still would have gotten 2 or even 3 in a 24 hour period from 2 of our busy groups. I'm actively requesting feedback so I may learn more. My suggestion at the moment, is to have an additional email delivery option: "daily summary of activity". This could be every 24 hours/ daily. I'd suggest on that one (since it will be clipped/truncated) to make the index titles link to the actual web version of the posts. I'd also suggest that the reply links link to the web interface so people can use that to reply (because the reply links don't work well after the digest gets truncated). And this could be an elective option for those who don't want multiple digests but don't want special notices only. Also - i think once the issue of that 1AM digest is resolved that will help too. Maria
|
|
moderated
Re: Digests tweak
Just got an offlist message from a member of my group who's also in another group, that one with a ginormous amount of daily traffic. She is being driven crazy, says she's now getting about a dozen digests a day. Suggests that the number of posts in a digest could be a member option. She had no problem with her email trimming long messages. It does seem optimal, if at all feasible to implement, to let the number of posts be a member option. Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
moderated
Re: Event: Site maintenance, Thursday, 2 February 2017
#downtime
#cal-invite
I love the banner, BTW, "down for upgrades." "Are you down for upgrades?" "Yeah I'm down" LOL -- Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|