For general Groups.io questions, please see the Group Managers Forum and Group_Help groups. Note: those groups are volunteer-led and are not officially run by Groups.io.
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
ro-esp
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:12 am, J_Catlady wrote:
yes, that would be my initial association too. I'd never say "cheers" without a glass or cup of alcoholic beverage in hand - but then I'm Dutch. groetjes, Ronaldo
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Something's up with Signatures
Brian Vogel <britechguy@...>
Mark, I keep my "signature stash" in plain text and format it once pasted. I could definitely have some extra weird HTML somewhere in there because I'm using the WYSIWYG editor in Groups.io to format it. I have done "paste overs" as well. What I can't figure out is why the editor screen renders these things one way while the actual forum software is rendering them another. I will be happy to do whatever you'd like me to do in order to figure that out (if that's of any interest).
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Something's up with Signatures
Hi Brian, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. I checked one of your sigs, and there's a bunch of extra HTML in it. Did you cut and paste the sig from somewhere else? You can see the extra HTML by switching to the Code View in the editor (button directly to the left of the Question Mark button). Mark
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Brian Vogel <britechguy@...> wrote:
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
BTW I just tested the "removed" notification, and Mark thought ahead on that one. There's no "cheers" added. J
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:43 AM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
--
J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Or, You're banned. Have a great day! Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 12, 2016, at 6:40 AM, Ro <recarlton@...> wrote:
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
even better,
You're Banned!
Friends Forever,
Ro
Buy a gun today....The American Rifle Association
From: beta@groups.io <beta@groups.io> on behalf of J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 6:12 AM To: beta@groups.io Subject: Re: [beta] Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message As a closing for a rejected message notification, I find it ironic (if not downright cruel). The closing for the banned notification was changed awhile back for similar reasons. 'You're banned. Drink up!'
J Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 12, 2016, at 2:51 AM, David P. Dillard <jwne@...> wrote: > > > > I also agree that cheers is fine as a closing salutation. I believe that cheers is commonly used in Great Britain and Australia and Groups.IO is an international service > > > > > Sincerely, > David Dillard > Temple University > (215) 204 - 4584 > jwne@... > > > . > > >> On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, atinalee@... via Groups.Io wrote: >> >> I don't agree. It does not matter how one signs a letter. >> >> Anita >> >> >> >> >> -------Original Message------- >> >> From: Brian Vogel >> Date: 12/11/2016 1:41:58 PM >> To: beta@groups.io >> Subject: Re: [beta] Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message >> >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 09:54 am, atinalee@... wrote: >> Sincerely sounds very formal. >> It's a rejection message. Formal is what is needed. >> -- >> Brian >> There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year-old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One >> is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally >> stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs. ~ >> John Rogers >> >> > > > -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
As a closing for a rejected message notification, I find it ironic (if not downright cruel). The closing for the banned notification was changed awhile back for similar reasons. 'You're banned. Drink up!'
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
J Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 12, 2016, at 2:51 AM, David P. Dillard <jwne@temple.edu> wrote: --
J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
David P. Dillard
I also agree that cheers is fine as a closing salutation. I believe that cheers is commonly used in Great Britain and Australia and Groups.IO is an international service
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Sincerely, David Dillard Temple University (215) 204 - 4584 jwne@temple.edu .
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, atinalee@yahoo.com via Groups.Io wrote:
I don't agree. It does not matter how one signs a letter.
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Laurence Taylor
J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@gmail.com> wrote:
Lol Ro, I think what you may mean is that perhaps there is some"We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!" - Vroomfondel, H2G2. -- rgds LAurence <>< ... Enough of your taglines, Q!
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
lol absolutely. ;)
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
I absolutely meant what i said missy!
Chirps,
Ro the irascible
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy® Note 4.
-------- Original message --------
From: J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> Date: 12/11/16 14:49 (GMT-08:00) To: beta@groups.io Subject: Re: [beta] Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message Lol Ro, I think what you may mean is that perhaps there is some advantage, in some contexts, of minimizing the use of what some people may, or may not, have called absolutes.
J
Sent from my iPhone
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Ro,
Your most sincerely humble savantLOL. I almost missed that one. Shal https://groups.io/g/Group_Help https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Lol Brian 'believe I've ever seen' Back at you! 😜 Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Brian Vogel <britechguy@...> wrote:
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Brian Vogel <britechguy@...>
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 02:49 pm, J_Catlady wrote:
perhaps there is some advantage, in some contexts, of minimizing the use of what some people may, or may not, have called absolutes. That's the most "embroidered" of qualified statements I believe I've ever seen. Brava! I have made mistakes, but have never made the mistake of claiming I never made one. ~ James G. Bennet
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Lol Ro, I think what you may mean is that perhaps there is some advantage, in some contexts, of minimizing the use of what some people may, or may not, have called absolutes. J Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Ro <recarlton@...> wrote:
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Its good to maintain a sense of humor in these groups, as well as avoiding absolutes
Ro
with Silk gazing over the fence, and Sally, Handy, Feliz & Police Kitty patrolling in the Great Beyond.
From: beta@groups.io <beta@groups.io> on behalf of atinalee@... via Groups.Io <atinalee@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2016 1:52 PM To: beta@groups.io Subject: Re: [beta] Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
-------Original Message-------
From: Brian Vogel
Date: 12/11/2016 4:48:25 PM
To: beta@groups.io
Subject: Re: [beta] Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message It does not matter to me how one signs a letter. There, fixed that for you. It matters a great deal to a lot of people. It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others. ~ John Andrew Holmes --
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Brian Vogel <britechguy@...>
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 01:01 pm, atinalee@... wrote:
There, fixed that for you. It matters a great deal to a lot of people. It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others. ~ John Andrew Holmes --
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
Miss Manners on Closing Salutations (and I consider her the ultimate etiquette authority)
Your most sincerely humble savant
Ro
with Silk gazing over the fence and presenting her rear as an appropriate closing salutation to mom and Sally, Handy, Feliz & Police Kitty patrolling in the Great Beyond and not gonna salutate no one.
From: beta@groups.io <beta@groups.io> on behalf of atinalee@... via Groups.Io <atinalee@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2016 11:32 AM To: beta@groups.io Subject: Re: [beta] Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
|
||||
|
||||
moderated
Re: Canned (or I suspect canned) "Message Not Approved" Message
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Brian Vogel <britechguy@...> wrote:
When you posted the first time, one of the search nodes went down, causing a delay in posting, which caused the web server to time out and give you a 504. One of my main objectives for December is to reduce our dependence on and perhaps eliminate the existing search system (elasticsearch), because it's been so unreliable. Thanks, Mark
|
||||
|