For general Groups.io questions, please see the Group Managers Forum and Group_Help groups. Note: those groups are volunteer-led and are not officially run by Groups.io.
|
locked
Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in)
#suggestion
On 22 Aug 2016 at 19:50, J_catlady wrote:
I'm just putting in a wishlist feature if it doesn't already exist inI was letting you know that it does exist in practical form. -- Jim Poston@vch-nv.us << People who snore always fall asleep first. >>
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in)
#suggestion
Well, I'm not sure any more that I understand the process you're trying to describe. If all they have to do is reply with "1", that would be very nice. If, OTOH, they have to delete all prior text, as you said before, that I'll stick with my feeling that it's impractical. I haven't tried any of this out yet myself. I'm just putting in a wishlist feature if it doesn't already exist in practical form. I'm done here. Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in)
#suggestion
On 22 Aug 2016 at 15:47, J_catlady wrote:
> However, needing to remove everything else makes it very difficult for
> most email members ... probably to the point where I'd call the
> nuisance factor prohibitive.
You can also click on Reply to Group within the group email and type "+1".
I don't think it can be any easier. (Of course, it probably won't work for
those who still have the default signature "Sent from my iPhone".)
Would you want another link in every email sent out for the possibility of a
like? What alternative did you have in mind?
For me, the nuisance factor of yet another link at the bottom of every
group email is enough for me to give up on "like".
--
Jim
Poston@...
<< If your e-mail client has more fluff than function, try Pegasus. >>
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in)
#suggestion
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 03:39 pm, Jim Poston wrote:
Everything else must It's an interesting feature that I didn't know existed. However, needing to remove everything else makes it very difficult for most email members, especially ones using mobile, probably to the point where I'd call the nuisance factor prohibitive. Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in)
#suggestion
On 22 Aug 2016 at 14:49, J_catlady wrote:
If there's a way to allow people to "Like" posts from within emailReply with just "like" or "+1" in the body of the post. Everything else must be deleted, including the quote of the previous message. -- Jim Poston@vch-nv.us << Go away, or I shall taunt you a second time. >>
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Merge messages to one action
Benoît Dumeaux <dread_axefr@...>
|
|
|
|
locked
"Like" a message from within email (without having to log in)
#suggestion
For the benefit of email subscribers, I'm trying to get group members to cut down on posts with no content besides agreement or thanks. The "Like" button could accomplish that, but it requires people to log in. If there's a way to allow people to "Like" posts from within email without logging in, that would be great.
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
|
|
locked
Merge to topic, search messages
Benoît Dumeaux <dread_axefr@...>
Impossible to merge messages of a search
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Merge messages to one action
Benoit Dumeaux <dread_axefr@...>
Thanks but I want to merge lot of message to one threads… repeating the merge action is boring.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Description changed
OTOH, cancel that request. I don't care about having to set it each time, because the bulk of the posts in our group don't contain attachments anyway So having to set it for those cases is not a bother.
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Description changed
Mark, Would, or could, the flag be on a group-wide basis? In my group, nobody would ever want search to include attachments. So I'd love to be able to set this once and for all, within my group, as the default for search. It would be cumbersome to have to set it for each individual search. Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Description changed
Great! Thanks, Mark. J
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Beta Integration <beta@groups.io> wrote: [Beta] The description of card "Flag to not search in attachments" was changed to: --
J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
|
|
locked
Description changed
Beta Integration <beta@...>
[Beta] The description of card "Flag to not search in attachments" was changed to:
Message search defaults to searching the message body along with all attachments. Create a flag to disable searching within attachments.
|
|
|
|
locked
Updates to Trello
Beta Integration <beta@...>
[Beta] The card "Event RSVPs" was archived.
[Beta] New card "Flag to not search in attachments" was added to list "Message Search".
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: keep history available for members who left
#suggestion
I'm having a lot of trouble finding apparently correct results in a member activity search after a member leaves the group. A member left yesterday and all that appears in the history is the action of leaving. Also, when I search on a member name (after the member has left), it returns different results from when I search on the email address. The email address also appears to work (in some cases) only if the "@gmail.com" part is left out of the search term. I could go on and on with the seeming anomalies and seemingly incorrect or weird results. I don't even remember them all but can go back in and find details and report them to support as bugs. I'm not sure it's worth the effort. Bottom line, I'm finding the member activity search after a member leaves extremely flakey and unpredictable, and therefore it would really be helpful for this to be facilitated as proposed above by Mark and Shal.
-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Separate Admin Menu options from member menu options
Mike Fay <mikefay8888@...>
Thanks, I've reported it. Mike Fay
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Separate Admin Menu options from member menu options
#suggestion
Mike,
I have my main group and subgroup settings for "members visible" Set toConfirmed in my test group (shalstest@). This appears to be a bug or oversight, and should be reported to support@groups.io so that it gets entered into the issue tracking system. In the past when that option was set to "Subscribers" non-mods could see a Members item in the left hand column. It produced a table with fewer columns than the version visible to moderators. Shal https://groups.io/g/Group_Help https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Merge messages to one action
Benoît, How do to merge all these messages to one action ? See: Feel free to ask questions about this in GMF@.
Shal
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Mute topic w/o logging in
#suggestion
Frances,
Sorry, Shal, it turns out only Rochelle's message was incorrect on myI was going to suggest in that case that perhaps Ro had cc'd or bcc'd you directly in her reply, but I see that her reply was to J's initial post rather than to yours. That you could have detected in your iPhone by the lack of the standard group footer. My copy of Ro's message does have the In-Reply-To field (which is how I'm certain she replied to J), and the References field as well, so short of some kind of glitch in the transmission of your copy I don't know why your iPhone might single out this message for misbehavior. Shal https://groups.io/g/Group_Help https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Mute topic w/o logging in
#suggestion
I don't know whether it was a member momentary blip I don't know whether it was a momentary blip Sent from my iPhone
|
|
|