Date   

locked Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in) #suggestion

 

On 22 Aug 2016 at 19:50, J_catlady wrote:

I'm just putting in a wishlist feature if it doesn't already exist in
practical form.
I was letting you know that it does exist in practical form.

--
Jim
Poston@vch-nv.us

<< People who snore always fall asleep first. >>


locked Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in) #suggestion

 

Well, I'm not sure any more that I understand the process you're trying to describe. If all they have to do is reply with "1", that would be very nice. If, OTOH, they have to delete all prior text, as you said before, that I'll stick with my feeling that it's impractical. I haven't tried any of this out yet myself. I'm just putting in a wishlist feature if it doesn't already exist in practical form.

I'm done here.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author. 

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


locked Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in) #suggestion

 

On 22 Aug 2016 at 15:47, J_catlady wrote:

> However, needing to remove everything else makes it very difficult for
> most email members ... probably to the point where I'd call the
> nuisance factor prohibitive.

You can also click on Reply to Group within the group email and type "+1".  I don't think it can be any easier.  (Of course, it probably won't work for those who still have the default signature "Sent from my iPhone".)

Would you want another link in every email sent out for the possibility of a like?  What alternative did you have in mind?

For me, the nuisance factor of yet another link at the bottom of every group email is enough for me to give up on "like".

--
Jim
Poston@...

<<     If your e-mail client has more fluff than function, try Pegasus.      >>
  


locked Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in) #suggestion

 

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 03:39 pm, Jim Poston wrote:
Everything else must
be deleted, including the quote of the previous message.

It's an interesting feature that I didn't know existed. However, needing to remove everything else makes it very difficult for most email members, especially ones using mobile, probably to the point where I'd call the nuisance factor prohibitive.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author. 

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


locked Re: "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in) #suggestion

 

On 22 Aug 2016 at 14:49, J_catlady wrote:

If there's a way to allow people to "Like" posts from within email
without logging in, that would be great.
Reply with just "like" or "+1" in the body of the post. Everything else must
be deleted, including the quote of the previous message.

--
Jim
Poston@vch-nv.us

<< Go away, or I shall taunt you a second time. >>


locked Re: Merge messages to one action

Benoît Dumeaux <dread_axefr@...>
 


locked "Like" a message from within email (without having to log in) #suggestion

 

For the benefit of email subscribers, I'm trying to get group members to cut down on posts with no content besides agreement or thanks. The "Like" button could accomplish that, but it requires people to log in. If there's a way to allow people to "Like" posts from within email without logging in, that would be great.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author. 

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


locked Merge to topic, search messages

Benoît Dumeaux <dread_axefr@...>
 

Impossible to merge messages of a search


locked Re: Merge messages to one action

Benoit Dumeaux <dread_axefr@...>
 

Thanks but I want to merge lot of message to one threads… repeating the merge action is boring.


locked Re: Description changed

 

OTOH, cancel that request. I don't care about having to set it each time, because the bulk of the posts in our group don't contain attachments anyway So having to set it for those cases is not a bother. 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author. 

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


locked Re: Description changed

 

Mark,

Would, or could, the flag be on a group-wide basis? In my group, nobody would ever want search to include attachments. So I'd love to be able to set this once and for all, within my group, as the default for search. It would be cumbersome to have to set it for each individual search.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author. 

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


locked Re: Description changed

 

Great! Thanks, Mark.
J

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Beta Integration <beta@groups.io> wrote:
[Beta] The description of card "Flag to not search in attachments" was changed to:

Message search defaults to searching the message body along with all attachments. Create a flag to disable searching within attachments.



--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author. 

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


locked Description changed

Beta Integration <beta@...>
 

[Beta] The description of card "Flag to not search in attachments" was changed to:

Message search defaults to searching the message body along with all attachments. Create a flag to disable searching within attachments.


locked Updates to Trello

Beta Integration <beta@...>
 

[Beta] The card "Event RSVPs" was archived.


[Beta] New card "Flag to not search in attachments" was added to list "Message Search".


locked Re: keep history available for members who left #suggestion

 

I'm having a lot of trouble finding apparently correct results in a member activity search after a member leaves the group. A member left yesterday and all that appears in the history is the action of leaving. Also, when I search on a member name (after the member has left), it returns different results from when I search on the email address. The email address also appears to work (in some cases) only if the "@gmail.com" part is left out of the search term. I could go on and on with the seeming anomalies and seemingly incorrect or weird results. I don't even remember them all but can go back in and find details and report them to support as bugs. I'm not sure it's worth the effort. Bottom line, I'm finding the member activity search after a member leaves extremely flakey and unpredictable, and therefore it would really be helpful for this to be facilitated as proposed above by Mark and Shal. 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author. 

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


locked Re: Separate Admin Menu options from member menu options

Mike Fay <mikefay8888@...>
 

Thanks, I've reported it.
 
Mike Fay


locked Re: Separate Admin Menu options from member menu options #suggestion

 

Mike,

I have my main group and subgroup settings for "members visible" Set to
"subscribers". I need for all members to be able to see the complete
members list for each group/subgroup they are a part of.

Unless I am missing something, there is currently no way for the normal
non mod/owner subscriber to get to/view the members list.
Confirmed in my test group (shalstest@). This appears to be a bug or oversight, and should be reported to support@groups.io so that it gets entered into the issue tracking system.

In the past when that option was set to "Subscribers" non-mods could see a Members item in the left hand column. It produced a table with fewer columns than the version visible to moderators.


Shal
https://groups.io/g/Group_Help
https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum


locked Re: Merge messages to one action

 

Benoît,

How do to merge all these messages to one action ?

See:
https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/How-To-Merge-Threads

Feel free to ask questions about this in GMF@.

Shal
https://groups.io/g/Group_Help
https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum




locked Re: Mute topic w/o logging in #suggestion

 

Frances,

Sorry, Shal, it turns out only Rochelle's message was incorrect on my
iPhone.
I was going to suggest in that case that perhaps Ro had cc'd or bcc'd you directly in her reply, but I see that her reply was to J's initial post rather than to yours. That you could have detected in your iPhone by the lack of the standard group footer.

My copy of Ro's message does have the In-Reply-To field (which is how I'm certain she replied to J), and the References field as well, so short of some kind of glitch in the transmission of your copy I don't know why your iPhone might single out this message for misbehavior.


Shal
https://groups.io/g/Group_Help
https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum


locked Re: Mute topic w/o logging in #suggestion

Frances
 


I don't know whether it was a member momentary blip

Should read 
I don't know whether it was a momentary blip

Sorry, Ro!

Frances

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 21, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Frances <travel@...> wrote:

Sorry, Shal, it turns out only Rochelle's message was incorrect on my iPhone. 

Subject line is

Re: Mute topic w/o logging in

Message 10789

I can't see the full headers on my iPhone but other messages are behaving correctly. I am on my way home later today and can only check on my Mac computer then.

I don't know whether it was a member momentary blip or something else. I'll double-check later on my home computer.  

Frances


Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 21, 2016, at 1:51 AM, Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote:

Francis,

I could not respond to this message to the group through Reply in email
on my iPhone (latest iOS), only to the author of the message.

Just that message, or any Groups.io message?

If they all misbehave (in groups that are set to Reply To Group) on that device that would imply that the email UI in your iPhone does not respect the Reply-To: header field, which is how Groups.io (and Y!Groups, and other list services) direct replies to the list.

I think I recall hearing this complaint against some mobile devices before.

Does your email UI support examining the full message header (view full header, view source, or something like that)? If so you can verify whether the message had a Reply-To field, as all messages from Groups.io should.

An error?

I'd say so. But which kind is still murky.


Shal
https://groups.io/g/Group_Help
https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum