toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
As I was the cause of this being raised, I'll offer a view that 5 might be considered too few but I appreciate that there must be some restriction because they all restrict (or are restricted by) the overall (and finite sized) collection of group names.
For subgroups though, the limit can be higher (but still finite, just for sanity) because they come from a different pool.
Keep safe, Malcolm.
Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@...>