Date: 01/09/21 11:20:33
Subject: Re: [beta] Samuel's Paid User Proposal #suggestion
And the refund issue is orders of magnitude more complicated when members pay. There are synchronization issue between confirmation, pending questionnaires for restricted groups, multiple vs single groups, etc.
For me its a dealbreaker. It radically changed the entire model and what we’re all doing here. But that’s just me.
On Jan 9, 2021, at 9:07 AM, Sandi D <sandi.asgtechie@...> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 10:21 AM, J_Catlady wrote:
I think it would be clearly unethical for a member to pay for a year's worth of a group, get kicked out, and not get their money back.What happens to groups who have paid and get closed down for not following the rules?
If a member of a group has paid $3-5 a year for an individual GIO account, they can join a different group. Maybe they have learned their lesson after the banned behavior. I have paid many a $69 a year no refund fee for a service I was not satisfied with. I don't think a non refundable $5 a year for an individual account is going to break anyone. They aren't banned from GIO. They have all their GIO benefits including joining another group.
The optional model of allowing individuals to become paid supporters of GIO is in addition to the optional model of allowing group owner to become paid supporters of GIO.
If the groups I helped create are forced to pay at any point they will leave GIO. If the members in those groups are given the option to pay at any point, many will continue on as members and the created groups they are in will remain as groups and attract more paying and non paying members.
Someone has to pay. Allowing both group owners and GIO account holders the option to pay seems like it should be reasonably to considered.
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.