moderated Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal #suggestion

Scott Chase

RE: Once the free member slots are filled up, someone wishing to be a new member of the group would have to pay a yearly fee to
  1. Having any mix of free slots versus paid slots will create a Group culture of have/havenot members, and a perception of some being freeloaders while others are forced to pay to remain a member of a group. Free members will sit on the free slots and not release them, preventing the most valuable members to the Group from being free. Resentment, etc.

  2. We create these groups to bring people together to discuss and support each other. The threat of forcing payment to simply join, or shortly thereafter, will kill the vast majority of the not-for-profit and hobby groups on No one will join any group if develops a reputation of forcing a fee for membership! Even Free Grandfathered Groups will be dodged by the masses, because people will think they have to pay to use in general. " isn't free!" Impressions are everything!
If something must be done for to survive, I'd prefer...

  1. A uniform price for ALL members of;

  2. And the first YEAR is free, so members become very well established in a Group, and for them to develop a sense of value and belonging, before a time-is-up, pay-up or be forced-out scenario occurs.
As it is now, only owners are able to give Mark money. I still think a Wikipedia-style ' depends on donations' button needs to be added to help support the funding of individual groups and as a whole. If donations alone don't generate enough income, Mark could figure out an accounting method to credit group owners for member donations, where the owner then would only be charge the remaining balance for a Group at the end of the billing cycle.


Join to automatically receive all group messages.