moderated Re: Feature requests/Canny after two weeks


I concur, consolidating all functions to the beta group and "canning" Canny makes the most sense.


On 12/26/19 12:02 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
Hi All,

So, it seems that some peopleĀ are using Canny to submit feature requests and that it can be a useful tool for doing so. I do see a few drawbacks:

- There are still a bunch of posts to beta that would be more appropriate instead as Canny feature requests.
- There is no notification of new posts to Canny on beta. So it can be difficult to know when new things are posted to Canny.
- People who don't run premium groups cannot post to Canny.

I can address the second issue with a custom email summary sent to beta on a regular basis, but that will require some development effort on my part. My main problem with Canny is with the first issue; people will still post feature requests on beta, and the discussion about those feature requests will still happen on beta.

I thought of another way we could address this, using just the beta groupĀ and hashtags. We could use a designated hashtag for feature requests (and maybe another for bugs). That would make it easy to address the first issue above; if someone posts a feature request without the correct hashtag, I can just add it. To view all feature requests, just filter on the hashtag. The one main thing that doesn't provide is the ability to sort by popularity (ie likes). However, I could add something like that to the search results page (he says without thinking it through completely).

(Also, I would add 'status' hashtags, like #closed, #planned, etc)

What do you think? I'm willing to continue using Canny if you all think it's a good solution. Or we could switch to something like my proposal. Or something else if someone has a better idea.

Mark (still on vacation)

Join to automatically receive all group messages.