moderated Re: Testing new feature request/tracking system
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I suggest deferring the ability of all users to request new features until the backlog of requests from paid subscribers via their moderators has been worked down. When the development team has the capacity for additional improvements, they should be submitted via the group's moderator. Group owners (who created their group with a purpose in mind) can decide if the new feature is consistent with their group's goals.
[Be Green] Please do not print this email unless necessary
From: J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...>
To: main <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thu, Dec 26, 2019 8:01 am
Subject: Re: [beta] Testing new feature request/tracking system
I agree with Chris and had the same thought. This separation seems likely to cause a deluge of requests on canny by people completely unfamiliar with the product and who likely should be taking many of their concerns to GMF. There are already a few such requests. OTOH, it’s no problem for Mark to ignore such requests, and there seems to be no easy way around it besides possibly a restriction to having had a premium group for at least a certain amount of time.
On Dec 26, 2019, at 4:20 AM, Chris Jones via Groups.Io <chrisjones12@...> wrote:
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
Note on an occupational hazard: I comment frequently in beta based on my desire for the betterment of groups.io as a product. Only a fraction of the time are my comments and suggestions specifically a matter of self-interest. Don't assume the latter when the former may be the case.