toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
You can call it a bug or an inconsistency. 😀
On Aug 30, 2019, at 12:07 PM, Gerald Boutin <groupsio@...
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:47 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:38 AM, Gerald Boutin wrote:
One: the Permission - That allows the moderator ....
No, it is an inconsistency. If something is a permission, I can't give it to myself. It must be given to me by someone higher up.
Two: The (Subscription) preference/setting that the Moderator has control of.
I wouldn't consider this an inconsistency.
You would not call a variable that can be set by either the member or the owner (for example, a member's overall delivery preference) a "permission" just because someone higher than the member (a mod or owner) can set them.
This is just a slight inconsistency, but I think it does hint that during implementation, Mark had on one side of his mind the idea that this setting is actually a permission. Unfortunately, in another part of the implementation (the actual editing of the setting), it behaves as a preference rather than a permission.
I thought we decided a while back that this was a bug, not an inconsistency.
eg) It should be working this way (but it isn't):
eg) Owner sets the permisison (P)
and the Moderator is given the option (O) to accept or not.
Result should be P "AND" O
In any case, it is what it is....
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu