locked Re: Seeding groups
Walkraft,I disagree with you. It doesn't have to be "new, modern and fresh". Just because english doesn't have a word for it (in dutch:degelijk), doesn't mean people can't appreciate the lack of bells, whistles and changes-for-the-sake-of-change
And I'm okI don't think you need thousands of groups yet. The big downside with yahoo's "more is better"-philosophy is that for some subjects there are dozens of tiny "paralel" groups, and often spamhavens.
[did you have a procedure in mind for when the mods go "AWOL" ?]
In terms of categorizing groups, that opens a big can of worms. PerhapsIf groups.io grows big, you may want to add a "sorting by geographical area", or maybe even "languages allowed" [nothing urgent about that]
One thing I don't think Groups.io does a very good job with right now isYou can try to advertise your group(s) in a yahoogroup called Aannounce ...