I understand your concern.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
For people who are on low, fixed income or who just want to budget
their resources, free groups should exist. So long as the group is
honoring such a service or about such a service.
If someone says they're on disability but starts a group for a service
lots of members make good money at. Such as construction work. Or
office support. I could kind of see how the paid model would be a
better fit for the groups sake.
On 4/24/18, jamie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
i think there should be free accounts still for people with disabilities who
need online friendships or use groups.io as ahobbie who like to make groups
for friends so i voat yes for free accounts still
chat soon jamie
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: 24 April 2018 17:57
Subject: Re: [beta] Make Basic level accounts paid
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:37 am, Bruce Bowman wrote:
in my opinion Mark is already giving away too much
That's possible. I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea to cut down on
the functionality in the free version. But I think there should always be a
free version, if for no other purpose than to lure new people in (should I
say, less cynically, "build new relationships"?) and build trust with them.
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu